My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1207_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1207_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 2:35:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
195 <br />196 <br />197 <br />198 <br />199 <br />200 <br />201 <br />202 <br />203 <br />204 <br />205 <br />206 <br />207 <br />208 <br />209 <br />210 <br />211 <br />212 <br />213 <br />Attachment C <br />a. Area calculations far gross land area <br />b. Existing zoning district(s) <br />c. Layout of proposed lots and proposed uses. Denote outlots planned for <br />public dedicarion and/or open space (schools, parks, etc.) <br />d. Area calculations for each parcel <br />e. General location of weflands and/or watercourses over the property and <br />within 200 feet of the perimeter of the subdivision parcel <br />£ Location of existing and proposed streets within and immediately adjacent to <br />the subdivision parcel <br />g. Proposed sidewalks and trails <br />h. Proposed parking areas <br />i. Proposed parks, common areas, and preservation easemenYs (indicate public <br />vs. private if applicable) <br />j. General location of wooded areas or significant features (environmental, <br />historical, cultural) of the parcel <br />k. Location of utility systems that will serve the property <br />l. Other: An applicant may submit any additional information that may explain <br />the proposed PUD. <br />(iii) PUD Concept Plan Proposal Review <br />214 Upon receiving a PUD concept plan proposal, the Community Development <br />215 Deparrinent shall schedtiile a date upon which the City Council will review the plans <br />216 and provide feedback to the applicant. Tlie Community Development Department <br />217 shall i�provide notice of the informational meeting to all property owners within 500' <br />218 of the property boundary of the proposall. <br />219 1. Dw-ing the meeting, the City Council n�ay make comment on the merit, needed <br />220 changes, and suggested conditions that the proposer should adhere to with any <br />221 future application. <br />222 <br />223 <br />224 <br />225 <br />226 <br />% Comment [BGA25]: For tlie sake of public <br />engagement, we are recommending an incrcase <br />to the norma1350' statutory notice requirement <br />to ensure potentially interested parties are <br />aware of the proposal. <br />2. The City Council may take comment from the public as part of the meeting. <br />3. IThe City Council shall make no farmal decision as part of the consideration%. The —� Comment [eGA26]: As drafted, concept <br />City Council's comments are explicitly not an approval or denial of the project, plan is simply required so the applican[ can ger <br />feedbacknand the public can be mformed. <br />and are intended only to provide information for the applicant to consider prior to There would be no approval or denial at this <br />application for a possible PUD Preliminary Plan. stage if chis language moves forward. <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.