My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015_1207_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2015
>
2015_1207_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 3:03:26 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 2:35:25 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
263 <br />264 <br />265 <br />Attachment C <br />e. Area calculations far each parcel; <br />f. Proposed setbacks on each lot (forming the building pad) and calculated <br />buildable area; <br />266 g. Proposed gross hardcover allowance per lot (if applicable); <br />267 h. Existing contours at inteivals of two feet. Contours must extend a minimum <br />268 of 200 feet beyond the boundary of the parcel(s) in question; <br />269 i. Delineation of wetlands and/or watercourscs over the property; <br />270 j. Delineation of the ordinary high water levels of all water bodies; <br />271 k. Location, width, and names of existing and proposed streets within and <br />272 immediately adjacent to the subdivision parcel; <br />273 1. Easements and rights-of-way within ar adjacent to the subdivision parcel(s); <br />274 m. The location and orientation of proposed buildings; <br />275 n. Proposed sidewalks and trails; <br />276 0. Vehicular circulation system showing location and dimension for all <br />277 driveways, parking spaces, parking lot aisles, service roads, loading areas, <br />278 fire lanes, emergency access, if necessary, public and private streets, alleys, <br />279 sidewalks, bike paths, direction of traffic flow and traffic conYrol devices; <br />280 p. Lighting location, style and mountin� and light distribution plan. <br />281 q. Proposed parks, common areas, and preservation easements (indicate public <br />282 vs. private if applicable); <br />283 <br />284 <br />r. Locarion, access and screening detail of large trash handling and recycling <br />collection areas <br />285 4. IColored building elevations which detail the building materials bein� used and <br />286 clearly communicate the look and design of the proposed building(s);� <br />287 5. A grading drainage and erosion control plan prepared by a registered professional <br />288 engineer, providing all information outlined in �city code section dedicated to <br />289 plan requirements>j; <br />290 6. A urility plan providing all informarion outlined in <city code section dedicated <br />291 to plan requirements>; <br />292 7. A landscape plan prepared by a qualified professional providing all infarmation <br />293 outlined in �Section 1011.03 Landscaping and Screening in All Districts�; <br />294 8. A tree preservation plan as required by Section 1011.04 Tree Preservation and <br />295 Restorarion in All Districts; <br />296 9. The location and detail of signage providing all pertinent information necessary <br />297 to determine compliance with Chapter 1010, Sign Regulations. <br />298 10. �A traf6c study containing, at a minimum, the total and peak hour trip generation <br />299 from the site at full development, and the effcct of such traffic on the level of <br />300 service of nearby and adjacent streets, intersections, and total parking <br />301 requirements.l <br />Page 9 of 13 <br />Comment [BGA32]: Colored renderings of <br />proposed structures can be critica] in <br />determining whether a PUD will or will not fit <br />on a property as proposed. <br />—' Comment [BGA33]: Notations to other code <br />sections will be filled in as we co��tinue work <br />on this Ordinance <br />—'" Comment [BGA34]: In places wherc we've <br />alrcady identified specific code sections, we <br />Uelieve our references are accurate, but will <br />confirm such witli staff prior to going before <br />Cha Planning Commission. <br />i CommenY [BGA35]: This traffic study <br />� requirement is optional to include, but again, <br />� can be administratively waived by staff if <br />deemed unnecessary. Traffic studies are <br />ty}�ically compellad by environmental reviews, <br />� but this would be an additional way to get that <br />data iPdesired by the City. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.