Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2015 <br />Page 13 <br />Commission's good tracic record in involving the public over the years, and ex- <br />pressed his confidence they would continue to do so going forward. <br />Chair Stoner clarified that the Commission would not intend the underground <br />storage to be used as a climate-controlled inaintenance area, but only for durable <br />goods and/or electric golf cart storage, with maintenance and its related issues not <br />intended for that area. Chair Stoner noted that this would involve storing and re- <br />moving carts as needed from the basement area versus how they were stored up- <br />stairs at this time. <br />At the request of Councilmeinber Willmus, Chair Stoner advised that the intent <br />would be for lawn inowers and similar equipment to be stored in a separate facili- <br />ty as done currently. <br />Mayor Roe thanlced the Coininission for their work and noted the additional <br />homework they were now tasked with going forward. <br />Councilmember Laliberte also thanlced the Comrriission for their work on the <br />wildlife ordinance and management policy recently enacted by the City Council. <br />Public Comment <br />Mayor Roe recognized Finance Coinmission Vice Chair Justin Rohloff, and <br />Commissioners Angela Byrne and Edwin Hodder present tonight and coming <br />forward to speak. <br />Draft Park Capital Funding Polic�(Attaclunent A) <br />Vice Chair Rohloff referenced an email previously provided to the City Council <br />from Finance Director Miller outlining the three differences between the Finance <br />Cornmission and Parlc & Recreation Commission's recommendations. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff further advised that the Finance Commission inet after receiv- <br />ing the Parlc & Recreation Commission'.s recommendations, as presented to the <br />City Council tonight during their joint meeting, and had ratified their initial unan- <br />imous support to remain with their three original recommendations. Vice Chair <br />Rohloff noted this included a maxiinuin allocation in the Park Dedication Fund of <br />$900,000 versus $1 million in the park acquisition fiind as outlined for park ac- <br />quisition. Vice Chair Rohloff stated that the Finance Commission could not sup- <br />port retaining a$1 million balance based on historical average park dedication <br />revenues over the last 6-7 years; and at which time there had been no allocation <br />for CIP needs during that same time. <br />In response to the Parlc & Recreation Commission's Attachment A, Vice Chair <br />Rohloff provided the scenarios previously provided by the Finance Coinmission <br />for the Park Improvement Fund (PIP) basecl on assumptions, showing a$5 inillion <br />shortfall in that fund for CIP. Revising those assumptions based on this Park & <br />Recreation Commission-supported policy, Vice Chair Rohloff presented revisions <br />