My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2015_1116
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
CC_Minutes_2015_1116
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2015 9:52:39 AM
Creation date
12/8/2015 10:22:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/16/2015
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 16, 2015 <br />Page 14 <br />to those scenarios by the Finance Commission with a one-time cash infusion of <br />$400,000 and 2/3 allocation of all future monies, assuming a 10-year average as <br />indicated historically of $170,000. Given those assumptions, Vice Chair Rohloff <br />noted it would result in a$2.4 million shortage in funding existing parlc assets. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff noted that the Finance Commission's recommended policy, as <br />recently adopted by the City Council, stressed inaintaining existing assets versus <br />new acquisitions. <br />Specific to Parlc Dedication Funds, Councilinember Willmus suggested an aster- <br />isk noting that those funds could fluctuate annually; asking that as development <br />and redevelopinent saw an increase in activity, that be lcept in mind. <br />Vice Chair Rohloff duly noted that variable in forecasting assumptions; however, <br />reiterated that the task to the Finance Cominission was to annually review fund <br />balances, expressing assurance that all variables would be kept in mind. <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Vice Chair Rohloff confinned that the Finance <br />Coinmission's 10-year historical review had included those variables in arriving <br />at the aru�ual $170,000 average input. <br />At the request of Councilmember McGehee, Vice Chair Rohloff clarified the Fi- <br />nance Commission's recoirunendation to set aside $900,000 for park acquisition <br />with $400,000 dedicated to CIP needs; and 2/3 and 1/3 allocations as noted by the <br />Finance Cominission's recommendations going forward, but not recommending <br />any new monies being added. <br />Commissioner Hodder noted that the intent was to restore the gap over a 5-6 year <br />period, and if no money was allocated to CIP, that gap would continue to grow. <br />Councihneinber Laliberte thanked the Finance Commission and Parks & Recrea- <br />tion Commission for working together and for providing their differing view- <br />points to inform City Council decision-making. <br />Councilmeinber Etten noted he was not cormnitted to a minimum of $900,000 or <br />$1 inillion. However, after the Owasso Ballfields acquisition, Councilmember Et- <br />ten noted that would consume a significant amount of that allocation of $600,000 <br />for acquisition and $400,000 in CIP, leaving a balance under $300,000. Coun- <br />cilmember Etten stated that this already created an issue with little money availa- <br />ble to provide the requested flexibility in the near future, of which he was con- <br />cerned. <br />Regarding the referenced einail from Finance Director Miller, and based on his <br />lack of preference for maintaining either miniinum balance, if retaining the two <br />funds, Councilmember Etten opined that it seemed prudent that the City Council <br />not initially spend froin that based on discussions with the Parlcs & Recreation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.