My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2015
>
2015-10-27_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2016 3:07:19 PM
Creation date
1/21/2016 3:06:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/27/2015
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
single-family homeowners, but noted that would vary somewhat based on their <br />water consumption. Specific to the capital improvement plan (CIP), Mr. Miller <br />noted that costs were projected out twenty years, but reviewed and updated <br />annually. <br />Water Operations <br />At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Miller confirmed that depreciation was built <br />into the accounting process, with approximately $1 million built into water rates <br />annually to address CIP needs most importantly in addressing the City's aging <br />infrastructure. <br />Specific to the proposed Intern position, Member Seigler suggested college <br />students as a practical part of their course work may be a good fit in forecasting <br />data. Mr. Miller advised that this was the intent for this position, provided the City <br />Council supports it, for a college student to either fill that role, or provide support <br />to existing staff allowing them to perform data gathering and trending. <br />Member Wozniak asked if staff looked at customer counts and distinctions between <br />residential and commercial accounts on an annual basis in determining unit costs, <br />particularly if more customers are added, perhaps there would be no need for the <br />proposed 1.5% rate increase in 2016. <br />Mr. Miller advised that customer counts and distinctions were part of the annual <br />analysis and reflected accordingly, as well as use patterns over the last twelve <br />months and before recommending any rate adjustments going forward. While that <br />information is not available yet in real time, Mr. Miller advised that the latest <br />available data is reviewed. <br />At the request of Member Seigler, noting the new developments (e.g. Rosedale <br />Center addition, new hotels) that would increase commercial customers, Mr. Miller <br />responded that those customers would probably not impact 2016 rates until <br />construction was completed and would not be counted until coming on line and <br />occupancy became more certain in projecting rates for 2017 and beyond. <br />At the further request of Member Seigler, Mr. Miller advised that rates had actually <br />been decreased some years, which he would reflect later in this presentation when <br />looking at comparative data. <br />At the request of Chair Stenlund, Mr. Miller clarified "personal" services as <br />personnel assigned to water operations and including their wages and benefit <br />package. <br />Mr. Miller shared that it was fortunate that the City would not be experiencing any <br />increase in wholesale water purchases from the St. Paul Regional Water System, <br />the single largest operating cost for the water operation. Mr. Miller stated that was <br />Page 4 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.