Laserfiche WebLink
• consultant to talk about the �,eed to upgrade a n <br />identification signs at buildings that are owned m nd °f business <br />Roseville Pro perti e s. M u c h o f t he discussion at th ps r a t e d b y <br />focused on the pro pos e d m o d i f i c a t i o ns to the si n ord' m e e t i n g <br />a l low ground monument s i g n s t o b e l oca te d claser to the r a n c e t o <br />W a Y t han pylon signs. We agreed to kee lght-of- <br />discussions proceeded and p them informed as these <br />related to a number of specificv sites m information specifically <br />4• Stark (483-3233) <br />Tom Stark of Central Cable came in to review their ro <br />letter that was sent to them by Rick Jopke. T p gress on a <br />outlined a number of concerns that the Cit he letter from Rick <br />of due to some complaints that had been eceived een pride aware <br />these complaints focused on the dumpster o ncipally <br />view of a number of service trucks n the property and the <br />as service vehicles that are improp y turnin e pe °perty as well <br />Drive. We discussed a number of possible g ft on Woodhill <br />screening problem at the dumpster as well as a numbeions to the <br />which the edge between the North Central i r of ways in <br />neighbors to the west could be further bufferellation and the <br />Mr. Stark agreed that he would d and screened. <br />well as conduct a meeting with r p esentat ves of the restions as <br />neighborhood to the west. idential <br />solution, we invited him tow come back developed an alternative <br />• review these alternatives. Since n for an appointment to <br />special use permit, it will be necessarprtoect was approved as a <br />to this special use permit, irregardle s of the esseci amendment <br />of the solutions that they chose to pursue, p flc nature <br />5• McClinton (347-93686) <br />Dennis McClinton from Towle Real Estate is leasin <br />that is located at 1853 W. 5 a property <br />clarification of the role and�relat on h p of theas in to re <br />for the listing of his Twin Lakes plan <br />long range vision for th se atrea nd ethatl �he t� at this was the <br />property owners in the neighborhood to continue lto o�erat allow <br />even expand their existing businesses, but, if buildinps Wee and <br />be torn down and actual physical redevelopment to occu g re to <br />Cit�• would be requiring this redevelopment to be cons r� then the <br />the Twin Lakes plan. This was the only clarificatio Stent with <br />McClinton was requesting, n that Mr, <br />6. Kehr (484-9027) <br />Mr. A1 Kehr was in to discuss his planned unit develo <br />townhouses located south of Count Pment for <br />Street. As you are all aware this Y Road C and west of Dale <br />the City and denied previousl� Project had been processed by <br />� some modifications to y' Mr• Kehr is interested in making <br />application for townhouses lon th s�ssite and <br />reprocessing an <br />process and procedures and provided him with e a d co ussed the <br />py of the <br />