Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />� <br />� <br />Planning Office Hou• <br />September 23, 1986 <br />C� <br />Page 2 <br />3. Casev. 489-2259 <br />Jlm Casey was in to review possible methods of dividin <br />property north of Victoria. g his <br />house and several lots He Wants to sell his existing <br />lots could layed out withnd discussed ways in which these <br />We suggested the public accesslsystemcwould�bepth lic access. <br />that he should acquire topographical data of the bsst' and <br />prepare a preliminary plat. lte and <br />We noted the City's policy on the construction of <br />streets and utilities. He agreed that his westerl public <br />1ot, contiguous to the Zittel Y most <br />with that property based on thepsanitary sewerdabi developed <br />was constructed by the City several g�ent that <br />years ago. <br />4• Commers 781-3367 <br />Pat Commers was in with Mark Murlowski, re ard' <br />d�velopment of the 3.5 acre Soo Line site at the ing the <br />corner of Long Lake Road and Count Road D, southeast <br />zoned industrial, and the Y This land is <br />structures on the site, y propose to put up to three <br />(two s�ory) building fo� �om�erSuCOmPanY Wor�hO square foot, <br />The second would be a 10,000 square foot (two s�orut $600,000. <br />for SMR Computers, at a Y) bui�.ding <br />would be an 8,000 square footX(twoestory�sbuildi The thixd <br />Builders, worth approximatel n9 for Belair <br />additional area of screened outdoo��s�orageThe T�w�uld need an <br />the development would be approximatel al value of <br />Y �1.1 million. <br />APparently the site has severe soil <br />Were held with Craig Waldron r�garding�developmentdassisSions <br />through tax increment financing, tance <br />current policy of the Craig nc��ed the City�s <br />as the increments occurpoverna through of tax increment funds <br />pproxima�ely a three year U�rinri <br />They are going to pr�pare <br />that the site might notrbellargey <br />�tructures, in which case the Belair <br />be d�leted. <br />site plans, realizir�g <br />enough tor a11 three <br />Buixders building might <br />5• Thompson, 332-1234 <br />Milo Thompson, John Akiba (trom Thompson's <br />Lab�re, landscape architect, were in to revisee�land Mark <br />plans €or Stage 1 of their Rosepointe Development� Randscape <br />the staging of their development, we find that thega�ding <br />processed for this site included a Planned Unit D�velo m�ans <br />ancl that the first stage of the development P nt, <br />entirely within one of the two lots to which pt�eossi lies <br />already platted. Thus, a land division will not be necte is <br />at this time, There need simply be joint easementsSsary <br />access and parking as app1ied �o the two lots relating to thr <br />total site. Thus, a buildin e <br />1 in accordance with the PlannedmUnitanDevelopmentfor Stage <br />aPproved. already <br />