Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren

Home

LJ Planning Office Hours, April 30� 1986 Page 3 • We also discussed with Gordie Beseth the numbering system for buildings to be constructed in the Woodbridge "Centre Pointe" development. We agreed on utilizing the City's overall numbering system, utilizing generally numbers divisible by fifty, such as 2800, 2850, 2900, etc. Thus, the address for most of the structures would be such a number on Centre Pointe Road. There is no other street in Roseville lining up with Centre Pointe Road. Raymond Avenue is further to the west, but would constitute a much less desirable roadway name for the development. � U 6. Edina Realtv, 836-3760 Dave Kringel and Terry McDonough from Edina Realty, at 2780 North Snelling, were in to discuss a possible new location for an Edina Realty office in Roseville. We talked about the northeast quadrant of County Road C and Snelling (Bill Fine's property) and other properties appropriately zoned in the City. They, of course, want high visibility, and are willing to build a relatively large office structure. They will review the alternate locations suggested, hoping to find a successful solution soon. 7. Casey, 489-2259 Jim Casey owns 3.4 acres of wooded, rolling land north of the east/west portion of Victoria Avenue (across from Resurrec- tion Cemetery). He is desirous of selling the property and, in particular, his existing home. If he does not find a buyer for all the land, he would propose to plat the property into approximately three to four lots, and retain the remainder. He suggested a lot pattern that would include the extension of a strip of land out to Victoria to serve his larger parcel next to the Zittel's property. This strip would go through land unsuitable for access, so we suggested that solution not be pursued. We noted Belair Builders interest in single family develop- ment. Mr. Casey agreed to get in touch with Mark Murlowski. 8. Ternes, 633-2834 Gretchen Terness was bacic with Dick Johnson, of D. W. Harstad Company, (builders) to review another revision to her site plan at the southwest corner of Fulham and Terminal Road. She proposes placing the building further to the south, with the parking at the northeast corner of the site (nearest the roads). The layout conforms to all requirements, and will work. We requested, however, that before the City approves this layout, that she get a written statement from the contiguous single family owners to the south who, on the basis of the previous public hearing (at the time of the rezoning) assumed the building would be further north. � Being contiguous to single family homes, this development will be subject to a site plan approval prior to building permit issuance.