Correspondence 1985-1989 Dahlgren

Home

i � � Planning Office Hours October 8, 1986 Page 4 The setback for the parking on the east side of the site was shown at less than the required fifteen feet. With respect to the sign, it was suggested that the site will remain in a nonconforming status unless a variance is processed and approved for the billboard. Provisions and the preparation of a grading plan would have to occur prior to their resubmitting the application for staff review. I suggested that this left. the Council with the option of considering these revisions without adequate staff review, or referring the substantially revised site plan back to the Planning Commission tor its cansideration. I noted that in cases of this kind, a submission of a radically revised site plan usually results in a referral back to the Planning Commission for its reconsideration. Revisions could include additional screening of truck loading area, movement of employee parking easterly, elimination of the one way truck �gress driveway, moving of the pick up loca�ion, adding landscape elements on portions of the site, adding a sidewalk designation an street frontac�e, resolution of the problem of the nonconforming advertising sign, and preparation of grada.ng and drainage plans. 5. Jonasen, 633-8080 Chuck Jonasen was in to see us �egarding the City's permis- sion to add an exterior dumpster to the Perkin's Restaurant site �ast of Snelling Avenue, north of County Road B. They want to tak� the interior dumpster location, and convert it tQ usable space. �e not�d that the variances issu�d to the site, wh�n it was an Uncle John's Pancake Restaurant, were on the candition that the dumpster be inside the structure. I suggest�d, therefore, that placing the dumpster outside in this important area of the City is not allowed. We r�oted too, that revi.sions are proposed for the Target store site, and that I had sugg�:sted the Target store people get in touch with him regardi.ng their changes as they� may affec� Perkin"s site conditians. 6. Stub�nberg, 489-9444 Elaine S�ubenb�rg and Ann�tte Rahn wexe in to discuss possible d,u�Ie� use for a home owned by Elaine Stubenberg at 232� Victoria. This is a very large lot with an older hotne, portions of which are I:cated on the f uture right-caf �-way f or Lovell. The home now has a second unit, previously occupied by relatives. �nnette Rahi� is Mrs. Stubenberg's daughter, �nd px'Qposes to occupy the second unit in the structure. We reviewed the City's pUlicy regarding duplexes, and � suggested that it may be appropriate tor them to request the Building Inspector to review the structure prior to any further action.