My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-04-06_VB_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Variance Board
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas
>
2016-04-06_VB_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2016 4:39:39 PM
Creation date
4/8/2016 4:39:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Variance Board
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and increases densities. Specific to the surface parking variance, the proposal provides safe <br />ЍЏ <br />vehicular and pedestrian movements, allows for adequate parking, incorporates generous <br />ЍА <br />landscaping, and ensures a creative aesthetic character. Therefore, Planning Division staff <br />ЍБ <br />believes the senior cooperative embodies the sort of reinvestment that is supported by the <br />ЍВ <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />ЎЉ <br />b. <br />The proposal is in harmony with the purposes and intent of the zoning ordinances. A <br />ЎЊ <br />significant part of the purpose for prohibiting standard parking stalls between a building and <br />ЎЋ <br />the front street is to avoid an auto-oriented development type in which buildings are set back <br />ЎЌ <br />on the site and large parking areas are placed near the street. The zoning code does, however, <br />ЎЍ <br />allow a drive lane and ADA-compliant parking stalls to be constructed in front of the <br />ЎЎ <br />building. The parking stalls provided adjacent Woodhill Drive are planned to be used by <br />ЎЏ <br />residents and visitors, but not employees. Although the proposed front parking area would <br />ЎА <br />include non-ADA stalls for residents and visitors, Planning Division staff believes that the <br />ЎБ <br />proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinances because the scale of the <br />ЎВ <br />proposed front parking area is in keeping with what is permitted by the zoning code. For <br />ЏЉ <br />these reasons, Planning Division staff believes that the proposal is consistent with the intent <br />ЏЊ <br />of the zoning ordinances. <br />ЏЋ <br />c. <br />The proposal puts the subject property to use in a reasonable manner. Planning Division <br />ЏЌ <br />staff believes that the proposal to provide ADA, visitor, and resident parking in the north <br />ЏЍ <br />parking lot adjacent to Woodhill Drive is a reasonable request for a senior development <br />ЏЎ <br />d. <br />There are unique circumstances to the property which were not created by the landowner. <br />ЏЏ <br />United Properties final plat, which was approved by the City Council, includes plans for the <br />ЏА <br />construction of a 105-unit senior cooperative on Lot 1 and an agreement to sell Lot 2 to the <br />ЏБ <br />City to preserve the Owasso Ballfields. The approved agreement also includes the <br />ЏВ <br />construction of 60 parking stalls that are to be shared by the senior cooperative and the <br />АЉ <br />ballfield. The requirement of §1004.06.H, Surface Parking, and the 60-stall shared parking <br />АЊ <br />lot at the south end of the site creates a unique challenge for United Properties to achieve <br />АЋ <br />compliance with all the design and parking requirements of the Code. Planning Division <br />АЌ <br />staff finds that the senior project, coupled with the development agreement and shared <br />АЍ <br />parking agreement, is a unique enough circumstance to support a variance to §1004.06.H, <br />АЎ <br />Surface Parking, allowing the parking adjacent to Woodhill to include non-ADA stalls. <br />АЏ <br />e. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Although this <br />АА <br />variance seeks a minor deviation from the Multi-Family Design Standards, the request to <br />АБ <br />include not just ADA-compliant parking in the parking lot adjacent Woodhill, but also visitor <br />АВ <br />and resident parking, will not alter or significantly change the character of the property or the <br />БЉ <br />adjacent neighborhood. <br />БЊ <br />f. <br />Section 1009.04 (Variances) of the City Code also explains that the purpose of a variance is <br />БЋ <br />“to permit adjustment to the zoning regulations where there are practical difficulties applying <br />БЌ <br />to a parcel of land or building that prevent the property from being used to the extent <br />БЍ <br />intended by the zoning.” The proposal appears to compare favorably with all of the above <br />БЎ <br />requirements essential for approving this variance. <br />БЏ <br />PF16-009_RVBA_040616 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.