My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-02-03_PC_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas
>
2016-02-03_PC_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2016 11:46:07 AM
Creation date
4/22/2016 11:45:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />d.Enhancement of Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) by maximizing interior daylight, <br />investment in appropriate ventilation and moisture control, occupant control over systems <br />such as lighting and temperature, and avoidance of materials with high-VOC emissions. <br />2.Improved Storm Water Management <br />Where appropriate, maximizing the use of ecologically-based approaches to storm water <br />management, restoration or enhancement of on-site ecological systems, and protection of off- <br />site ecological systems through the application of Low Impact Development (LID) practices. <br />3.Enhanced Buffering <br />Along property lines that abut different use types, implementation of two or more of the <br />Commented \[BGA16\]: <br />For this category, we are <br />recommending a minimum of two techniques be employed <br />following techniques: <br />.Additional <br />techniques can be added if desired. <br />a.Significant vegetative screening and maintenance of existing vegetation if possible and <br />appropriate; <br />b.Increased setbacks; <br />c.Inclusion of berms, walls, fencing, or a combination of such. <br />4.Structured Parking <br />Inclusion of structure parking to minimize land area dedicated to vehicles thereby <br />maximizing uses elsewhere on the property. <br />1023.09: PUD REVIEW PROCEDURE <br />All requests to establish a Planned Unit Development overlay district shall be initiated by following the <br />steps below. <br />A.Developer Open House Required Commented \[BGA17\]: <br />City staff determined that adding <br />in a second open house was necessary to further provide <br />exposure to the project at the front end of the project. The <br />1.Prior to submitting an application for PUD Sketch Plan review, the applicant shall be required <br />originally proposed open house after sketch plan review is <br />to hold a Developer Open House meeting in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1102, <br />still required by this final draft. <br />Section 1102.01(B). <br />Commented \[BGA18\]: <br />City staff has identified the <br />language in 1102.01(B) as the appropriate process to follow <br />for developer open houses.Notices for these meetings <br />2.The written summary required by Chapter 1102, Section 1102.01(B)(5) shall be submitted to <br />according to City staff are 500 feet as desired. <br />the City as a component of the subsequent PUD Sketch Plan application. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.