My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2016
>
2016-05-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2016 4:24:58 PM
Creation date
5/19/2016 4:24:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/24/2016
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5/19/2016 M S4 Annual Report for 2015 <br /> C Supervisor <br /> C] Minnesota Utility Contractors Association Erosion Control Training <br /> ( I Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control (CPESC) <br /> ( I Certified Professional in Stormwater Quality (CPSWQ) <br /> C"I Certified Erosion, Sediment and Storm Water Inspector (CESSWI) <br /> 0 Other <br /> Q61 Between January 1 , 2015 and December 31 , 2015, did you modify your BMPs, <br /> measurable goals, or future plans for your construction site stormwater runoff <br /> control program? [Part N.B.] <br /> C11 Yes <br /> (�) N o <br /> MCM 5: Post-Construction Stormwater Management <br /> The following questions refer to Part 11I.D.5. of the Permit. <br /> Q62 As of December 31 , 2015, have you enacted a regulatory mechanism to <br /> incorporate all requirements as specified in Part III.D.5.a. of the Permit? <br /> ( Yes <br /> Cj, N o <br /> Q63 What approach are you using to meet the performance standard for Volume, Total <br /> Suspended Solids (TSS), and Total Phosphorus (TP) as required by the Permit? <br /> [Part III.D.5.a.(2)] <br /> Check all that apply. <br /> Refer to the link http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.r)hr)/view-document.htmi? <br /> g.id,=j,.7.815, for guidance on stormwater management approaches. <br /> Retain a runoff volume equal to one inch times the area of the proposed increase of impervious <br /> surfaces on-site <br /> C , Retain the post-construction runoff volume on site for the 95th percentile storm <br /> k Match the pre-development runoff conditions <br /> C'13 Adopt the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) <br /> C An approach has not been selected <br /> Cl Other method (Must be technically defensible--e.g. based on modeling, research and <br /> acceptable engineering practices) <br /> Q64 Do you have written Enforcement Response Procedures (ERPs) to compel <br /> compliance with your post-construction stormwater management regulatory <br /> mechanism(s)? [Part III.B.] <br /> (j� Yes <br /> C) No <br /> Q65 Between January 1 , 2015 and December 31 , 2015, did you modify your BMPs, <br /> hftps://www.snapsurveys.com/wh/si am/surveylandi ng/pri ntervi ewer.asp?si d=746D70627A7478666D313436333636353735362E3731 12/16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.