My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016-05-25_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Agenda_Packet
>
2016
>
2016-05-25_EDA_Agenda_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2016 10:36:04 AM
Creation date
5/23/2016 10:35:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Economic Development Authority
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6b. Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, April 18, 2016 <br />Page 18 <br />tap into resources for citizens, creating a continuous cycle of updating and up- <br />keep of Roseville housing stock. <br />Mayor Roe <br />Mayor Roe identified his three most important issues as follows: <br />1)Remain focused on the Twin Lakes Redevelopment Area as a prime oppor- <br />tunity area over the next eighteen months. <br />2)How we look at business expansion and relocation within the Roseville com- <br />munity and opportunities to make connections with those looking at other <br />sites. <br />3)Marketing Roseville as a great place to relocate; or dealing with the city’s past <br />image with developers and negative perceptions that had developed over the <br />last few years. <br />Councilmember McGehee <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that she had used a different approach, and her <br />focus was on Head of Household jobs, and as part of that increasing the city’s in- <br />dustrial or commercial tax base. <br />Councilmember McGehee stated that she would also like to see a focus on devel- <br />opments going forward, and if that involved service/retail, ensure that they served <br />the residents of our community and based on a human scale with viable and easy <br />connections for the Roseville resident demographic allowing them to shop and <br />participate in their comfort zone. With elder residents, Councilmember McGehee <br />noted that larger format retail was not user-friendly for them; and to-date the city <br />had not focused transportation efforts so its own residents feel safe as pedestrians <br />and in vehicles, to access those things they need in their own community. <br />Councilmember Laliberte <br />Councilmember Laliberte agreed that there were corridors lagging other than <br />Twin Lakes, but was unsure where that fell within the list of priorities. <br />Mayor Roe clarified that the focus of his response was based on the questions de- <br />fining the next eighteen months. <br />1)Councilmember Laliberte expressed agreement Mayor Roe about the need to <br />address businesses or companies that may feel the need to leave Roseville be- <br />cause they were running out of space or needed different access to or for their <br />business. Councilmember Laliberte stated that she had held conversations <br />with Roseville businesses owners who, because of employee growth and/or <br />the need for larger meeting spaces for those employee connections, were look- <br />ing outside Roseville. <br />2)Councilmember Laliberte agreed that a bad reputation in the developer com- <br />munity had followed Roseville over the last decade, or the reputation of being <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.