Laserfiche WebLink
Human Rights Commission Minutes <br />December 9, 2015 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />Chair Groff stated the Council had also stated the Commission should act in an advisory <br />91 <br />capacity. He suggested the Commission consider providing annual demographic information to <br />92 <br />the City Council. <br />93 <br />94 <br />Commissioner Slade stated the Council would need to clarify their expectations on what <br />95 <br />advisory would mean. <br />96 <br />97 <br />Commissioner Christiansen stated the Scope, Duties, and Function states “full participation in <br />98 <br />the affairs of this community by assisting the State Department of Human Rights…” She stated <br />99 <br />this implied one of the Commissioners should act as a liaison to the State Department of Human <br />100 <br />Rights on behalf of Roseville. <br />101 <br />102 <br />Chair Groff suggested having Commissioner Lindsey from the State Department of Human <br />103 <br />Rights provide an update on the State’s activities for the Commission. They could look at <br />104 <br />involving Human Rights Commissions from surrounding communities in this presentation. <br />105 <br />106 <br />Commissioner Slade stated the Council would not fill the open vacancies until April. <br />107 <br />108 <br />Chair Groff stated the Commission would need to proceed with the members they have. <br />109 <br />110 <br />Commissioner Christiansen stated she had reapplied for her position since she had only been <br />111 <br />appointed to a 1-year term. <br />112 <br />113 <br />Ms. Collins suggested reviewing the City Code and determining tangible projects for those areas <br />114 <br />the City Council would like to have the Commission act in more of an advisory capacity and if <br />115 <br />there are no tangible projects then this may not be a realistic goal for the Commission. The <br />116 <br />Commission would have the opportunity to meet one more time to discuss the Scope, duty and <br />117 <br />functions prior to making their recommendation to the City Council. <br />118 <br />119 <br />Commissioner Carey clarified the scope, duties and functions should be defined prior to <br />120 <br />establishing the 2016 Commission work plan in order to ensure the projects meet the <br />121 <br />expectations of the City Council and their objectives as a Commission. <br />122 <br />123 <br />Ms. Collins stated the goal would be to have the scope, duties and functions identified and use <br />124 <br />these to determine the programming the Commission pursues in 2016. <br />125 <br />126 <br />Commissioner Christiansen clarified the Human Rights Commission would remain it’s own <br />127 <br />Commission and not be merged with another Commission. <br />128 <br />129 <br />Chair Groff based on the City Council meeting the Human Rights Commission would remain it’s <br />130 <br />own Commission for 2016. <br />131 <br />132 <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to have each Commissioner review the scope, duties, <br />133 <br />and functions and prepare recommendations to be reviewed and discussed at the January 2016 <br />134 <br />HRC meeting. <br />135 <br /> <br />