My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016_0420 HRC Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Human Rights Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
2016 Agendas and packets
>
2016_0420 HRC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 3:12:32 PM
Creation date
9/13/2016 3:12:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Human Rights Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Coversheet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Human Rights Commission Minutes <br />February 24, 2016 Draft Minutes <br />Page 4of 11 <br /> <br />136 <br />not been approved yet. <br />137 <br /> <br />138 <br />Chair Groff stated the Commission does do continued education for residents to understand the <br />139 <br />Minnesota Human Rights Act. <br />140 <br /> <br />141 <br />142 <br />purpose of the commission is to encourage full participation and uphold the Minnesota Human <br />143 <br />Rights Act by advising the City Council on long range programs to improve relations in the <br />144 <br /> <br />145 <br /> <br />146 <br />Commissioner Christiansen stated the second sentence in Section 205.02 should read <br />147 <br />clusion by providing educational and <br />148 <br /> <br />149 <br /> <br />150 <br />151 <br />meaning of this sentence. <br />152 <br /> <br />153 <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to change the second sentence in Section 205.02 to read <br />154 <br />155 <br /> <br />156 <br /> <br />157 <br />Commissioner Slade stated Section 205.02.B was redundant of 205.02.C. <br />158 <br /> <br />159 <br />Commissioner Christiansen stated Section 205.02.B and 205.02.F were the same and they could <br />160 <br />remove Section 205.02.B. <br />161 <br /> <br />162 <br />Commissioner Carey stated her interpretation was Section 205.02.B was focused on City Staff. <br />163 <br /> <br />164 <br />Commissioner Slade stated 205.02.B does refer more to City Staff and she does like the idea of <br />165 <br />doing training or programming for Staff but realizes this would take more resources than the <br />166 <br />Commission has available. <br />167 <br /> <br />168 <br />Chair Groff stated most of the City Council would support removing Section 205.02.B but they <br />169 <br />wanted the Commission to review this section to be sure. Removing this section would not limit <br />170 <br />the Commission. <br />171 <br /> <br />172 <br />Commissioner Carey stated the Council had felt the Civility Training the Commission did last <br />173 <br />year would be something that City Staff could do and they would like to see this training done <br />174 <br />again. This would be something the Commission could work on then hand it off to Staff to <br />175 <br />continue implementing for City Staff. <br />176 <br /> <br />177 <br />Chair Groff stated a program like the Civility Training would need to be approved by the City <br />178 <br />Council because of the on-going cost. <br />179 <br /> <br />180 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.