My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2016
>
CC_Minutes_2016_0912
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2016 10:34:29 AM
Creation date
10/6/2016 9:31:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/12/2016
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, September 12, 2016 <br />Page 37 <br /> <br />Councilmember Willmus referenced Condition 1 and asked whether ten feet is <br />adequate. Mr. Paschke explained that is the setback from the property line and <br />the other one has to do with the drive lanes to be able to park the semi-trailers, get <br />them out, as well as for fire vehicles access to extinguish a fire, if needed. <br /> <br />Mr. Dorff stated there would be a drive lane all the way around the building, trail- <br />ers will be no closer than ten feet from the fence, and a drive lane will be provided <br />in front of the trailers. The trailers will be single stacked initially. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe clarified the language indicates the trailers can be as close as ten feet <br />from the west property line and the final width and number of fire lanes shall be <br />approved by the Fire Marshal. That is the standard at this time so the applicant’s <br />understanding is correct as long as the Fire Marshal approves the fire lanes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Laliberte stated the conditions of this interim use may be differ- <br />ent from the one on the other Meritex property because the City has updated its <br />commercial inspections for the Fire Department. She noted the City has recently <br />experienced tractor trailer fires so some things being requested now may be dif- <br />ferent than before. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe asked Mr. Dorff if he understands and accepts those conditions based <br />on that clarification. Mr. Dorff answered in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Mayor Roe offered the opportunity for public input on the proposed Interim Use <br />for outdoor storage of semi-trailers prior to Council action. No one appeared to <br />speak. <br /> <br />Willmus moved, McGehee seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11361 (Attach- <br />ment F) entitled, “A Resolution Approving an Interim Use for Outdoor Storage of <br />Semi-Trailers at 2470 Highcrest/2501 Walnut.” <br /> <br />Mayor Roe restated this is consideration of a two-year Interim Use and if at any <br />time the conditions are not being met, this approval can be revoked. <br /> <br /> Roll Call <br />Ayes: <br />Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, McGehee and Roe. <br />Nays: <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />b.Twin Lakes Parkway to Langton Lake Trail Connection <br />Assistant Public Works Director and City Engineer Jesse Freihammer referenced <br />the RCA and summary provided for the Twin Lake Parkway to Langton Lake trail <br />connection as detailed in the RCA dated September 12, 2016, and related attach- <br />ments. He explained that because of the Twin Lakes Parkway project, staff sug- <br />gests adding a 325-foot pathway segment, which is well used by the neighbor- <br />hood, to the Twin Lake Parkway contracts since they are already on site. The cost <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.