My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2017 2:41:22 PM
Creation date
4/20/2017 2:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 20, 2017 <br />Page 16 <br />Mayor Roe sought clarification whether platting wasn't required for a minor sub- <br />division if other requirements were met, with the current process not requiring <br />plats for minor subdivisions. <br />City Manager Trudgeon noted that it involved a process for document and layout <br />approval, but was not a formal plat. <br />Regarding item 4, Mayor Roe noted that it seemed obvious from language provid- <br />ing that a subdivision should not create lots that don't meet minimum standards. <br />Mr. Lamb clarified that the excerpt from the City of St. Paul could be edited ac- <br />cordingly for further consideration by the City Council. Mr. Lamb noted the need <br />for placing the burden on public works when changing slopes to address any wa- <br />ter/sewer issues, or frozen pipes or water being pumped up hill creating low water <br />pressure. <br />Mayor Roe noted the need to ensure the close attention of the Public Works staff <br />on those specific issues. <br />Page 5 <br />Mr. Lamb noted some design standards that would be unique to code. <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Lamb confirmed the need to address them in <br />the subdivision code versus in the zoning code (e.g. block sizes). <br />Page 6 <br />Mayor Roe clarified that lot sizes were addressed in the city's zoning code, not its <br />subdivision code. <br />Page 6 (Park Dedication) <br />Mr. Lamb clarified some of this section, noting that references to more formal <br />plans and policies the city had adopted specifically or as part of comprehensive <br />plan updates superceded the subdivision code language developed in 1980. Mr. <br />Lamb noted that he had found only three occasions since that inception of land <br />dedication for park or open space, with the remainder of the situations resulting in <br />cash in lieu of land. <br />Mr. Lamb suggested consideration of a way that the subdivision code could help <br />support larger connectivity of the city itself (e.g. connecting trails or sidewalks) in <br />a broader nature than by simply setting a process and approach for cash applied to <br />a park or requiring additional recreation maintenance. Mr. Lamb noted that the <br />idea was to consider that larger picture and use the subdivision as a tool to <br />achieve that larger connectivity. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.