My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0320
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2017 2:41:22 PM
Creation date
4/20/2017 2:40:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/20/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, March 20, 2017 <br />Page 21 <br />place, network engineers could work on network issues versus troubleshooting <br />desk top users. <br />Finance Director Miller noted that system engineers performed many proactive <br />tasks to avoid system failures, and the more time they could spend on that versus <br />troubleshooting for end users, the better the overall system's uptime became. <br />Mr. Mayfield concurred, noting that by keeping that high level staff at Roseville, <br />the better benefit to the City of Roseville as well. <br />At its very function, Finance Director Miller noted that the collaboration created <br />and partnering agencies involved in the consortium were all impacted by and sen- <br />sitive to their respective taxpayers. In Roseville, Mr. Miller noted that this creat- <br />ed an opportunity to add three new positions without any tax increase, with the <br />funding provided through tower rentals; and further improving internet service <br />connection sharing and the economies of scale created with these opportunities. <br />Mr. Miller reported that each of the partnering agencies had already agreed to <br />move forward in supporting this additional staffing and paying their proportionate <br />share of the three positions. Mr. Miller advised that the Roseville share would <br />amount to $45,000, fully covered through existing funding sources for the IT <br />function. <br />With tower fees going into the IT capital funding stream, Mayor Roe noted the <br />need to make sure the city remained conscious that it not deplete funding for its <br />own capital needs. <br />Finance Director Miller concurred, noting that the hardware share for Roseville <br />amounted to $200,000 annually, with the levy not impacted for non -equipment <br />expenses paid by tower rental fees. <br />At the request of Mayor Roe, Finance Director Miller confirmed that the $45,000 <br />constituted reserves in tower fees, since inflators were built into each of those <br />agreements, with the increases greater than inflation rates to -date. <br />At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Mr. Miller advised that funding, if not <br />available from tower fees in the future, would come from other funds and charge - <br />backs. <br />Referencing the charts on page 3 of the staff report, Councilmember Willmus <br />sought clarification on the 5.6 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees spending <br />67% of their time on Roseville needs. <br />Finance Director Miller clarified that chart, based on the total number of employ- <br />ees and percentage of time spent in Roseville or on other agencies; and actual <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.