My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0515
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2017 8:07:27 AM
Creation date
6/9/2017 8:06:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/15/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 15,2017 <br /> Page 6 <br /> with tax levy increases and therefore,making them unable to provide as much prop- <br /> erty tax relief as they may prefer and creating difficult decisions for the City Coun- <br /> cil over the next few years. <br /> Property Tax Impact (page 9, line 207—page 10, line) <br /> At the conclusion of his presentation, Finance Director Miller advised that Depart- <br /> ment Heads were available in the audience to respond to more detailed questions <br /> of information needs of the City Council, with tonight's presentation designed to <br /> provide more information for the five-year CIP term. Mr. Miller asked that the City <br /> Council seek answers to any immediate questions or policy direction to staff at this <br /> point in the budget and CIP process. <br /> City Council Discussion <br /> Specific to levy thoughts, Councilmember McGehee reiterated her past preference <br /> against a flat utility fee across the board. Councilmember McGehee opined that it <br /> would make it more fair, and further opined that the current utility rate structure did <br /> not provide an equitable situation for meeting CIP needs and was onerous to some <br /> residents less able to pay current and projected increased rates. <br /> Finance Director Miller clarified that Councilmember McGehee was advocating <br /> for a shift cost from base fees to usage fees. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed appreciation for the manner in which this <br /> year's CIP information was packaged—both short-and long term views, as previ- <br /> ously requested by Councilmember McGehee when suggesting a 5-year CIP view. <br /> Councilmember Etten also expressed appreciation for the information provided and <br /> the work of departments in preparing it, providing residents and the City Council <br /> with a better understanding. However, Councilmember Etten noted that particu- <br /> larly the item by item descriptions by department were not always consistent and <br /> easy to follow from one department to the other (e.g. vehicle replacement) and <br /> asked that staff provide that more in-depth information by department and fleshed <br /> out consistently. <br /> Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Etten's suggestion, noting <br /> that it created a huge learning curve in deciphering the information and in being <br /> able to ask questions. <br /> Mayor Roe referenced the various graphs provided by staff incorporating those re- <br /> vised funding solutions as staff recommended, and spoke to the General Facilities <br /> Replacement Fund specifically (page 8). Mayor Roe noted problem years (e.g. <br /> 2023, 2031 and 2032) with replacement of rooftop HVAC units; asking that the <br /> particular facilities be provided as part of the detail for additional information. <br /> Mayor Roe asked that staff provide that detail via a follow-up memorandum not <br /> currently provided in this report. Further, Mayor Roe noted that in 2023,the graph <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.