Laserfiche WebLink
Finance Commission Minutes <br />April 11, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> 91 <br />Commissioner Harold stated the memo from 2011 does stated “The forfeiture accounts have 92 <br />been used to bridge the CIP shortfall and actual needs of the Department.” This leads one to 93 <br />believe that these funds can be used for the CIP gaps. 94 <br /> 95 <br />Chair Schroeder asked Finance Director Miller to follow up with the City Attorney about using 96 <br />these funds for the CIP shortfall. 97 <br /> 98 <br />Commissioner Hodder stated the 2011 memo also stated “There is no manner to realistically 99 <br />forecast expected expenditures of the accounts as forfeiture statutes mandate the funds be used to 100 <br />“supplement” the financial needs of a law enforcement agency and not replace budgetary 101 <br />funding.” 102 <br /> 103 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated the City Attorney had responded to the Commission previously that 104 <br />as long as the purchase fit the criteria of what the funds could be used for then it could be used 105 <br />towards CIP items. He asked if it would be possible to get a more complete summary of each 106 <br />account showing beginning balance, funds collect, all expenditures, and ending balance for 107 <br />future reports. 108 <br /> 109 <br /> 110 <br />Revisit Finance Commission Golf Course Funding Recommendation from September 8, 111 <br />2015 112 <br /> 113 <br /> 114 <br />Chair Schroeder provided background on the Commission’s previous discussions on the golf 115 <br />course funding recommendation. At the March 20, 2017 City Council meeting, the City received 116 <br />an update on four golf course clubhouse concept designs along with options for replacing the 117 <br />golf course maintenance building. During this presentation, the funding sources identified 118 <br />included $1,300,000 from the Park Dedication Fund, $400,000 from the Park Renewal Program 119 <br />fund, and $200,000 from the Golf Course cash reserves. The Commission’s prior proposal had 120 <br />been to transfer $400,000 of existing Park Dedications funds to the PIP, dedicate two-thirds of 121 <br />future Park Dedication funds to the PIP, beginning in 2020 repurposing $650,000 that was 122 <br />previously used for debt services for the PIP, and defer some of the planned PIP expenditures to 123 <br />future years to ensure a positive cash flow in the next five years. She stated even if the City 124 <br />decides to use all of the Park Dedication Funds for the Golf Course it would make sense to start 125 <br />putting two-thirds of the future park dedication fees towards the PIP. She clarified the Golf 126 <br />Course had not been included in the PIP and it should have been. 127 <br /> 128 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated another recommendation from the Commission had been to combine 129 <br />the Golf Course Fund with the Park Improvement Fund to provide a consolidated picture. 130 <br /> 131 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the funding sources identified by the Council does not fund the entire 132 <br />project so the City would have to either bond or increase the levy to cover these funds. Until the 133 <br />Commission receives additional direction from the Council it is difficult to determine what 134 <br />changes should be made to the policy recommendation. She suggested revising the graph to 135 <br />Item 3: Attachment A