My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_059_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_059_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:41:11 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:40:07 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />April 11, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 5 of 6 <br /> <br />Having no restrictions is not the same as having no obligations. These funds have been 181 <br />earmarked for projects or initiatives in the City. Committing these excess funds based only on 182 <br />policy may create unintended consequences. The uncertainty of not having these funds available 183 <br />for an intended purpose is a culture change for the City and this should be considered when 184 <br />making any changes. The City’s current leadership team does not think in 12-24 month 185 <br />increments but rather in 5-year increments because they have developed strategic plans. One of 186 <br />the first things to consider would be what are the commitments of these funds. 187 <br /> 188 <br />Commissioner Hodder asked if the excess funds collected for items such as water and sewer 189 <br />maintenance were reflected in this surplus. 190 <br /> 191 <br />Finance Director Miller stated at this time the Council has only discussed creating this cash carry 192 <br />over fund with the General Fund, Parks and Recreation Fund, Communication Fund, Information 193 <br />Technology Fund, and License Center Fund. 194 <br /> 195 <br />Chair Schroeder clarified that if a Department is doing well and they have a surplus does not 196 <br />mean that the budget will be cut the following year. She clarified that the Council is asking the 197 <br />Commission if the creation of this fund would be a viable option. 198 <br /> 199 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the recommended City Manager budget for 2018 will include a 200 <br />recommendation for the use of the $1.6 million overage from 2016. The Council would like to 201 <br />have a more transparent discussion on the use of these excess cash reserve funds. 202 <br /> 203 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated the biggest change would be budgeting towards a target reserve 204 <br />level. He stated he does support the concept of looking at the surplus/deficit cash reserves and 205 <br />budgeting it towards a goal amount of reserves up front instead of waiting until after the year 206 <br />ends. 207 <br /> 208 <br />Commissioner Harold stated he would agree with the preliminary concept of creating this fund. 209 <br /> 210 <br />Chair Schroeder moved, Seconded by Commissioner Harold, to provide the City Council with 211 <br />the Commission’s preliminary approval of the concept of the creation of the Cash Carry Over 212 <br />Fund and request additional direction from the City Council on the development of a policy. 213 <br />The motion carried unanimously. 214 <br /> 215 <br />Finance Director Miller suggested Chair Schroeder email the Commission’s decision to the City 216 <br />Council. 217 <br /> 218 <br /> 219 <br />Revisit Finance Commission Recommended CIP Funding Strategies from 2016 220 <br /> 221 <br />It was the consensus of the Commission to table the Finance Commission Recommended CIP 222 <br />Funding Strategies until the figures have been updated. 223 <br /> 224 <br /> 225 <br />Item 3: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.