My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017_0711_FC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Finance Commission
>
Packet
>
2017_0711_FC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2017 1:48:04 PM
Creation date
7/14/2017 1:47:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finance Commission Minutes <br />June 13, 2017 – Draft Minutes <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />Finance Director Miller stated the City receives about $1 million in State Aid Funds and special 91 <br />assessment revenue. He explained that the City Council has not acted on the Commissions’ 92 <br />recommendation to utilize $400,000 from the Park Dedication Fund and 2/3 of future park 93 <br />dedication fees. 94 <br /> 95 <br />Chair Schroeder asked if the Commission should discuss their recommendation for the park 96 <br />dedication fees with the City Council. 97 <br /> 98 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber asked if the City had made any funding decisions for the new club 99 <br />house at the Golf Course. 100 <br /> 101 <br />Finance Director Miller the City Council has not made any final decisions on the funding for the 102 <br />club house and the club house would not be included in the CIP because it is a new building. 103 <br />The City had discussed utilizing the reserves in the Golf Course Fund, the remaining funds from 104 <br />the Park Renewal Program, using the Park Dedication Fund, and issuing new obligation bonds 105 <br />that would be repaid with tax levy dollars. 106 <br /> 107 <br />Chair Schroeder stated it would be more likely that the City would use the Park Dedication Fund 108 <br />for the new club house versus adding it to the Park Improvement Program CIP. 109 <br /> 110 <br />Commissioner Bachhuber stated if the Park Dedication Fund was utilized for the new club house 111 <br />then the City will have to look at what the levy would have to be in order to support the Park 112 <br />Improvement Program CIP. The Commission could present the scenario that uses the park 113 <br />dedication fund for the CIP as the best scenario for the City and suggest the City look at other 114 <br />alternatives for the club house or the City will have to find other means of funding the CIP. 115 <br /> 116 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the current recommended scenario does not include the Oval and if they 117 <br />need to include this the outlook would change dramatically. The total costs for the Oval and the 118 <br />club house is about $5.3 million and there are no definite funding strategies for these items. 119 <br /> 120 <br />Commissioner Zeller stated until the City Council makes a decision on the use of the Park 121 <br />Dedication Fund the Commission should continue to present the current scenario as their 122 <br />recommendation for the Park Improvement Program CIP Fund. 123 <br /> 124 <br /> 125 <br />Continue Discussion on the CIP Document Format & Priority-Ranking (Scoring) 126 <br />Methodology 127 <br /> 128 <br />Chair Schroeder stated the City Council had adopted the Commissions’ recommendation for 129 <br />establishing a CIP priority ranking system. Those rankings were incorporated into the City’s 130 <br />Capital Improvement Policy. The Commission may want to consider how these rankings might 131 <br />be assigned to individual items contained in the CIP. 132 <br /> 133 <br />Finance Director Miller stated the City is in the process of assigning condition ratings to all of 134 <br />its’ assets but this has not been completed. Staff did prepare project/initiative summaries for 135 <br />Item #3: Attachment A
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.