Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 19, 2017 <br /> Page 9 <br /> ther detail creating more doors to open than necessary. At the request of Mayor <br /> Roe, Mr. Gaughan stated his agreement with that definition in the ordinance. <br /> Page 1, line 30 <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the use of"natural person." <br /> City Attorney Gaughan stated that, while this term is seen in numerous docu- <br /> ments, it was no legal obligation to use that term. <br /> Councilmember Willmus recalled that previous discussions were to strike "natu- <br /> ral" go with "person." Without objection, staff was directed to use proceed ac- <br /> cordingly by striking"natural." <br /> Page 2, lines 52 and 53 <br /> Without objection, language was revised in line 52 as "Acceptance of Roadways" <br /> rather than "streets;" and in line 53 to strike "land" from "Required Improve- <br /> ments," since that section included infrastructure and grading improvements as <br /> well. <br /> Page 6, Line 222 <br /> A typographical correction was noted to strike the hyphen between ""final" and <br /> "approval." <br /> Page 7 line 254 (specific grounds for variances) <br /> Mr. Lloyd noted other areas of code that cover specific grounds for variances ne- <br /> gating a prior City Council suggestion for more language in that section. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the vagueness of"essential character" and <br /> "unusual hardship," and if they were sufficient to invoke if needed. <br /> Mayor Roe noted, with confirmation by City Attorney Gaughan, that the city re- <br /> tained the latitude to invoke them as they came forward, with the city defining <br /> those specific grounds as pointedly or vaguely as it chose to do so. Mayor Roe <br /> expressed his preference for having more vague language allowing the City <br /> Council to exercise more flexibility depending on the specific case and situation. <br /> Page 7 lines 261 —268 and Page 12, line 457 <br /> Mr. Lloyd noted language variables bouncing from "streets" to "roadways" in the <br /> document, and in an effort to be consistent and eliminate any sense of redundan- <br /> cy, sought the City Council's preference to use "roadway" in place of"streets." <br /> Without objection, staff was directed to do so if interchangeable in definitions. <br /> Page 9, line 356 <br /> Item C (Bond), language was revised to strike "or owner" and change it to "or ap- <br /> plicant." <br />