My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0724
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2017 9:20:32 AM
Creation date
8/18/2017 9:15:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/24/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 24, 2017 <br /> Page 7 <br /> ber Etten noted that while some flexibility may be indicated, the design standard <br /> was still evolving and would eventually become more cohesive. <br /> Councilmember Willmus agreed that there may be room for compromise. <br /> With the Rice Street/Larpenteur Avenue visioning process, Mayor Roe updated <br /> the commission that the next meeting of that planning group would include a <br /> presentation by the consultant based on community feedback, advising that it may <br /> be coming before the commission in the near future. <br /> Chair Murphy opined that there had been some initial ambiguity accepted by the <br /> commission that the comprehensive plan update timing and looming deadline <br /> took precedence over that visioning plan and its subsequent completion, creating <br /> uncertainty in how they would mesh or whether they would actually do so. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that attempts continued to tie the two items together, but also <br /> noted the option for a comprehensive plan amendment at any point in the future. <br /> Councilmember Etten suggested that the commission and community remain <br /> open to more specificity as the city works with neighboring partners, but agreed <br /> with the Commission's basic understanding of the two processes. Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten stated that he hoped the vision could be included with the comprehen- <br /> sive plan update, even if not initially providing specific recommendations for that <br /> area. <br /> In general, Councilmember Willmus sought an update from the commission on <br /> their perspective with communication with the City Council and staff on various <br /> items coming before them, and whether it was functioning properly. <br /> Personally, Chair Murphy expressed interest in improving that area, specifically <br /> in the commission having City Council meeting minutes available to them if indi- <br /> vidual commissioners were unable to attend or view those meetings and prior to <br /> their next meeting. Chair Murphy noted the importance for the commission to re- <br /> ceive at least a summary of that discussion to understand and know the general di- <br /> rection as soon as possible to inform their meetings. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested that staff continue to work on that, noting the <br /> increased difficulties in turn-around time with the commission holding two meet- <br /> ings per month,but also recognizing the importance of that information. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed that was a legitimate point, and even if and when <br /> the City Council meeting minutes were not available from the recording secretary, <br /> suggested when relevant, a summary or excerpt of that discussion — whether ap- <br /> proved or not—could be provided to the commission for an understanding. <br /> Chair Murphy stated that the commission would be happy to accept a draft. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.