My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0911
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/5/2017 2:54:13 PM
Creation date
10/5/2017 2:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/11/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 11, 2017 <br /> Page 8 <br /> cally mentioning them in city code it could provide some controls on how and <br /> when they're permitted, how far away from a subject property, and other specif- <br /> ics. If that interest is shared by his colleagues, Councilmember Willmus reported <br /> that he had proposed language to consider. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she hadn't fielded any complaints, opining <br /> that open house signs are usually out on the day of the open house, and advised <br /> that she wasn't aware of them being out there longer than that. <br /> As an example, Councilmember Willmus referenced signage that was located <br /> quite some distance away for a property on the market along Fairview Avenue. <br /> Councilmember Willmus suggested city code amendment such as: "Real Estate <br /> open house signs may be placed within one-half mile of the subject property and <br /> not longer than one hour before the open house." <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that some homes not having direct access to a <br /> main street may need reasonable open house signage more than %2 mile from the <br /> site to clearly direct traffic to them. Councilmember McGehee stated that she was <br /> fine with the timeline suggested by Councilmember Willmus. However, before <br /> taking this step, Councilmember McGehee suggested staff performing a survey of <br /> real estate professionals selling in the area to gain their perspective and timing of <br /> advertising. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated her support of additional language to this section. <br /> Also, Councilmember Laliberte noted that this provided a good reminder for her <br /> that city code needed more definitive language as to what constituted "holiday <br /> signs,"which at this time seemed vague. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that there was a definition section in the sign code addressing <br /> "holiday signs." <br /> Councilmember Laliberte further noted that corrugated plastic lawn sign business <br /> signage was becoming more common on their street frontage in addition to their <br /> business signs and flags/banners, and asked what was currently being done to en- <br /> force that. <br /> Specific to temporary signs, that included those flags/banners and corrugated <br /> signs, City Planner Thomas Paschke reported that up to two were allowed annual- <br /> ly by city code, providing more flexibility for a total of up to sixty days per year <br /> and annual renewal of other signage. Mr. Paschke reviewed current code as to al- <br /> lowance of flags and corrugated signs up to 32 square feet, in addition to other re- <br /> quirements for how and when they could be utilized. <br /> Ms. Collins suggested that some instances still occurred where no permit had <br /> been taken out. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.