My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0918
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:43:54 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 10:43:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/18/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 18, 2017 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Even with commission recommendations, Mayor Roe stated that he wasn't happy <br /> with so much of the fund balance in the negative, opining that wasn't where it <br /> needed to be, suggesting that windfall revenue (e.g. TIF decertification and/or <br /> Park Dedication funds) as a way to shore up this as soon as possible since it af- <br /> fects the fund balance going forward. Even if that requires foregoing additional <br /> levy funds for the PMP and using those for General Facilities instead over the <br /> next few years, Mayor Roe opined that may be prudent since the PMP fund bal- <br /> ance is currently between $10 and $12 million now before the internal loan is tak- <br /> en, prompting him to consider levy increases for the General Facilities fund and <br /> shifting expenditures in the 2017 to 2020 period to avoid further negative num- <br /> bers in those funds. <br /> Chair Schroeder noted that there was a surplus in the operating fund, and instead <br /> of using it for operations, it could be used for a one-time infusion for CIP as an- <br /> other source. <br /> To the extent the commission wanted to make those recommendations, Mayor <br /> Roe asked that they formally do so upon further discussion. <br /> CIP: Park Improvement Program (Attachment Q AND CIP: Golf Course Capital <br /> Improvements <br /> As recommended last year and again this year by the commission, Commissioner <br /> Harold noted that this was the worst fund over the twenty-year period, prompting <br /> them to recommend utilizing park dedication funds to shore up this program as <br /> noted. Commissioner Harold noted that the commission had provided this as a <br /> formal recommendation before recent golf course decision-making. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that in 2028-2039 Park CIP levy increases should be reduced <br /> in order to keep the fund balance from growing indefinitely and should be formal- <br /> ized as a recommendation for future City Councils. <br /> Commissioner Harold advised that this ties into the next recommendation to com- <br /> bine the golf course and parks funds for CIP spending at the golf course and view- <br /> ing it as a larger park program as a whole. Commissioner Harold clarified that <br /> this assumed that the clubhouse building would be paid for in one-time funds; and <br /> as questioned by Mayor Roe, included the use of existing Golf Course Fund bal- <br /> ances as proposed for a community building. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that if the clubhouse was paid for with an internal loan, the <br /> graph may look even better in terms of fund balances. However, Mayor Roe stat- <br /> ed that a concern was when considering the Park & Recreation Fund, a lot of ex- <br /> penditures for 5-6 playgrounds currently included in the CIP would need to be de- <br /> ferred. While he considered this good progress, Mayor Roe noted that this fund <br /> still had the potential problem of going negative quickly, and asked for more rec- <br /> ommendations and how to reflect the golf course clubhouse as a community <br /> building in policy discussions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.