Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 18, 2017 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Even with commission recommendations, Mayor Roe stated that he wasn't happy <br /> with so much of the fund balance in the negative, opining that wasn't where it <br /> needed to be, suggesting that windfall revenue (e.g. TIF decertification and/or <br /> Park Dedication funds) as a way to shore up this as soon as possible since it af- <br /> fects the fund balance going forward. Even if that requires foregoing additional <br /> levy funds for the PMP and using those for General Facilities instead over the <br /> next few years, Mayor Roe opined that may be prudent since the PMP fund bal- <br /> ance is currently between $10 and $12 million now before the internal loan is tak- <br /> en, prompting him to consider levy increases for the General Facilities fund and <br /> shifting expenditures in the 2017 to 2020 period to avoid further negative num- <br /> bers in those funds. <br /> Chair Schroeder noted that there was a surplus in the operating fund, and instead <br /> of using it for operations, it could be used for a one-time infusion for CIP as an- <br /> other source. <br /> To the extent the commission wanted to make those recommendations, Mayor <br /> Roe asked that they formally do so upon further discussion. <br /> CIP: Park Improvement Program (Attachment Q AND CIP: Golf Course Capital <br /> Improvements <br /> As recommended last year and again this year by the commission, Commissioner <br /> Harold noted that this was the worst fund over the twenty-year period, prompting <br /> them to recommend utilizing park dedication funds to shore up this program as <br /> noted. Commissioner Harold noted that the commission had provided this as a <br /> formal recommendation before recent golf course decision-making. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that in 2028-2039 Park CIP levy increases should be reduced <br /> in order to keep the fund balance from growing indefinitely and should be formal- <br /> ized as a recommendation for future City Councils. <br /> Commissioner Harold advised that this ties into the next recommendation to com- <br /> bine the golf course and parks funds for CIP spending at the golf course and view- <br /> ing it as a larger park program as a whole. Commissioner Harold clarified that <br /> this assumed that the clubhouse building would be paid for in one-time funds; and <br /> as questioned by Mayor Roe, included the use of existing Golf Course Fund bal- <br /> ances as proposed for a community building. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that if the clubhouse was paid for with an internal loan, the <br /> graph may look even better in terms of fund balances. However, Mayor Roe stat- <br /> ed that a concern was when considering the Park & Recreation Fund, a lot of ex- <br /> penditures for 5-6 playgrounds currently included in the CIP would need to be de- <br /> ferred. While he considered this good progress, Mayor Roe noted that this fund <br /> still had the potential problem of going negative quickly, and asked for more rec- <br /> ommendations and how to reflect the golf course clubhouse as a community <br /> building in policy discussions. <br />