My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0918
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:43:54 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 10:43:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/18/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 18, 2017 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that tonight's focus and discussion would be specific to pigs <br /> and goats, along with the horse issue, and if time allowed it could give considera- <br /> tion to bees and poultry concerns. <br /> Pigs/Goats <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated that he had originally become interested in the is- <br /> sue of pygmy goats and Potbelly Pigs during campaign door-knocking in 2009- <br /> 2010. Councilmember Willmus opined that he found this certain segment of code <br /> not yet looked at, and in reviewing the horse section again last year, it had rekin- <br /> dled the need to look at current code. Councilmember Willmus stated that he was <br /> aware of Roseville residents keeping pygmy goats, apparently without issue, and <br /> disagreed with staff's perception that operational and logistical enforcement <br /> would be difficult if they were to be licensed in the city, opining that it should be <br /> no more difficult than with dogs. Regarding the emails he had personally re- <br /> ceived related to poultry, Councilmember Willmus clarified that his intent was <br /> never to look into that, given the lengthy discussion held in the past and his lack <br /> of interest in revising current regulations. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she had initially been for this and may still <br /> be; but as she had previously stated she would only consider them with the dis- <br /> tinction as indoor pets and not outside in the yard. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated that she had also encountered people during her <br /> campaign door-knocking in neighborhoods with small potbelly pigs in their <br /> homes, and even though they could get very large, she had heard of no neighbor <br /> problems. Councilmember Laliberte ventured a guess that there were numerous <br /> unlicensed pets, including dogs that the city didn't know about. Councilmember <br /> Laliberte agreed with Councilmember Willmus that staff's enforcement should <br /> not be burdensome. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated that he wasn't a huge fan of this piece, and even had <br /> friends with pygmy goats as pets. However, with this happening now, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten opined that there needed to be city code to regulate their health <br /> and welfare, as well as that of the community. If the City Council considered <br /> such revisions to Chapter 407.02, Councilmember Etten suggested looking at the <br /> acreage consideration and parameters around that. As per the staff report, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten stated that he was concerned with the size and number of ani- <br /> mals, and agreed that they may be appropriate pets, but questioned where to draw <br /> the line, especially when dogs are allowed to sleep outside in a doghouse and still <br /> be considered a family pet, but perhaps not pygmy goats or potbelly pigs. Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten stated that he would look for more restrictions and the acreage <br /> piece (e.g. farm animals on a %2 acre lot) beyond that proposed by staff at this <br /> point. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.