CC_Minutes_2017_0925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, September 25, 2017 Page 23 ed that she had no problem with the school operating as a business in the building under current guidelines; but did have a problem setting precedent. As recom- mended by Councilmember Willmus to look at the entire area versus picking it apart piece by piece, Councilmember McGehee agreed, opining that it didn't serve the community well and did not represent good policy. Councilmember McGehee opined that this proposed use didn't fit into the existing PUD nor fit in that location. Councilmember Etten also acknowledged the University of Northwestern and ex- pressed his appreciation of the many positive comments heard tonight about the community and school. Having colleagues who had graduated from the school, Councilmember Etten attested to the great value of the school, with the nursing program representing one area of that active student involvement in the communi- ty. Specific to the motion, Councilmember Etten stated his opposition, opining that this PUD was created as a job zone and the proposed use didn't fit that PUD and broader job goals for that area. While it will create some jobs, Councilmem- ber Etten opined that it would not fit with those job goals and current two-year economic development plan for the city. Also, once the building was renovated by the school, and if ever resold, Councilmember Etten questioned whether that renovation would make a turnaround to another business cost-prohibitive causing the building to remain vacant longer as a result. Therefore, Councilmember Etten stated that he couldn't support the requested use as a good fit with the current PUD and long-term use of this property. Also, Councilmember Etten stated that he couldn't agree with taking definitions from elsewhere in code to fit this PUD since it had specific goals around job creation when initiated and other pieces from other zoning areas may miss that particular goal. Councilmember Etten agreed that the city needed to look at this and other PUD's in the near future and their specific permitted uses. Speaking in support of the motion, Mayor Roe recognized comments related to other areas of this discussion and agreed that the Centre Pointe area needed fur- ther review and discussion to eliminate the existing PUD. Mayor Roe opined that he'd be okay with substituting the "Office/Business Park" designation for the original PUD. However, as a job zone, Mayor Roe pointed out the number of ho- tels in that vicinity, and while not staffed with higher-education-required or high- earning jobs, they had been allowed as part of the PUD in support of those types of jobs in the remainder of the district. Mayor Roe opined that uses supporting good jobs in those districts through educating people for those careers proved an appropriate use. Mayor Roe further noted that in previous discussions, the office based post-secondary use as part of the Office/Business Park designation had been included in 2010 zoning code. Mayor Roe opined that such permitted uses made sense and stated his support for that type of compatible office-type use. Mayor Roe further noted that office-based post-secondary uses were different from campus-based oneswhen those definitions were originally set up. Therefore, Mayor Roe opined that it made sense to support this PUD amendment. While