My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_0925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 11:11:11 AM
Creation date
10/19/2017 11:10:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/25/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 25, 2017 <br /> Page 23 <br /> ed that she had no problem with the school operating as a business in the building <br /> under current guidelines; but did have a problem setting precedent. As recom- <br /> mended by Councilmember Willmus to look at the entire area versus picking it <br /> apart piece by piece, Councilmember McGehee agreed, opining that it didn't <br /> serve the community well and did not represent good policy. Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that this proposed use didn't fit into the existing PUD nor fit in <br /> that location. <br /> Councilmember Etten also acknowledged the University of Northwestern and ex- <br /> pressed his appreciation of the many positive comments heard tonight about the <br /> community and school. Having colleagues who had graduated from the school, <br /> Councilmember Etten attested to the great value of the school, with the nursing <br /> program representing one area of that active student involvement in the communi- <br /> ty. Specific to the motion, Councilmember Etten stated his opposition, opining <br /> that this PUD was created as a job zone and the proposed use didn't fit that PUD <br /> and broader job goals for that area. While it will create some jobs, Councilmem- <br /> ber Etten opined that it would not fit with those job goals and current two-year <br /> economic development plan for the city. Also, once the building was renovated <br /> by the school, and if ever resold, Councilmember Etten questioned whether that <br /> renovation would make a turnaround to another business cost-prohibitive causing <br /> the building to remain vacant longer as a result. Therefore, Councilmember Etten <br /> stated that he couldn't support the requested use as a good fit with the current <br /> PUD and long-term use of this property. Also, Councilmember Etten stated that <br /> he couldn't agree with taking definitions from elsewhere in code to fit this PUD <br /> since it had specific goals around job creation when initiated and other pieces <br /> from other zoning areas may miss that particular goal. Councilmember Etten <br /> agreed that the city needed to look at this and other PUD's in the near future and <br /> their specific permitted uses. <br /> Speaking in support of the motion, Mayor Roe recognized comments related to <br /> other areas of this discussion and agreed that the Centre Pointe area needed fur- <br /> ther review and discussion to eliminate the existing PUD. Mayor Roe opined that <br /> he'd be okay with substituting the "Office/Business Park" designation for the <br /> original PUD. However, as a job zone, Mayor Roe pointed out the number of ho- <br /> tels in that vicinity, and while not staffed with higher-education-required or high- <br /> earning jobs, they had been allowed as part of the PUD in support of those types <br /> of jobs in the remainder of the district. Mayor Roe opined that uses supporting <br /> good jobs in those districts through educating people for those careers proved an <br /> appropriate use. Mayor Roe further noted that in previous discussions, the office <br /> based post-secondary use as part of the Office/Business Park designation had <br /> been included in 2010 zoning code. Mayor Roe opined that such permitted uses <br /> made sense and stated his support for that type of compatible office-type use. <br /> Mayor Roe further noted that office-based post-secondary uses were different <br /> from campus-based oneswhen those definitions were originally set up. Therefore, <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it made sense to support this PUD amendment. While <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.