CC_Minutes_2017_1009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 9, 2017 Page 9 In response, Councilmember Willmus clarified that his intent was not for an over- sight role by the Finance Commission, but more of an understanding and report- ing of what was done with each function and how they operated; and to have that information tied back more directly to the City Council. However, Councilmem- ber Willmus again clarified that his intent was not to have the Finance Commis- sion be the body to direct staff how to do their jobs with either of those functions. Councilmember Etten asked how this would be different than simply having staff provide the City Council with more detailed information (e.g. financing and budgeting work for the IT function) and how that process worked rather than hav- ing the Finance Commission look at it. Councilmember Etten stated that he was skeptical as to how it would work to have the Commission analyze these func- tions, even while understanding that the business aspects to the city of these func- tions may differ than those of other city departments. If Councilmember Willmus was seeking more information on the overall department function of the License Center and IT function, Councilmember Etten opined that staff could easily pro- vide that additional information. Councilmember Willmus opined that having an advisory commission, similar to the Parks & Recreation Commission working with the directors of these two func- tions, could serve as the model he'd like to employ with the Finance Commission; in other words to serve as a sounding board for staff liaisons to the commission and to provide that feedback to the City Council. At the request of Councilmember Etten for clarification, Councilmember Willmus agreed that he would also have no problem with the Finance Commission review- ing other enterprise functions (e.g. Golf Course) as well. Councilmember Laliberte agreed with the comments of Councilmember Willmus, and also in not intending it to be an oversight role, but simply as part of the "other duties as assigned" portion of each and all advisory commission structures. Councilmember Laliberte stated that she saw this as a snapshot look by the Fi- nance Commission to these functions, especially when the city is considering making significant investments in the License Center facility, and would provide an analysis to ensure the city was following best practices with that new space and its operations. Councilmember McGehee reiterated her opposition to this whole process, opining that both functions provided very clear and transparent operations and required no additional oversight. Councilmember Willmus opined that his intent was mainly to provide a tool by which staff(e.g. Finance Director Miller) would have another set of eyes and ears provided by the Finance Commission with which to work on various issues that may arise from time to time with the License Center and/or IT function, both rep- resenting significant operations within the city. Councilmember Willmus further