Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 23, 2017 <br /> Page 16 <br /> complete information be made available in the packet for the City Council and <br /> public. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that individual commissioners could submit and <br /> share those items they were passionate about with the full group. However, <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she saw subcommittees as an association of <br /> 2-3 people working on one task; and stated that she would rather fail to accom- <br /> plish as many activities as proposed versus not having transparency. <br /> Councilmember Willmus clarified that his concern was with 3-4 commissioners <br /> doing the work basically to completion and then bringing the package to the full <br /> commission, curtailing broader discussion. Councilmember Willmus noted a <br /> number of advisory commissions working on complex issues without the need for <br /> subcommittee involvement. Councilmember Willmus opined that a better way <br /> was needed to formulate ideas prior to a report by providing discussion amongst <br /> the broader group that may not be involved in a subcommittee but whose perspec- <br /> tives are just as important. Councilmember Willmus stated that he had no issue <br /> with 1-2 commissioners performing research to present to the full body. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed with Councilmember Willmus, stating that the line <br /> for him happens when a subcommittee produced a report for the full commission <br /> without bringing that discussion back to the broader group and thereby changing <br /> the dynamics of ongoing discussion throughout the process by the full commis- <br /> sion. Councilmember Etten recognized that most sitting council members had sat <br /> through advisory commissions for years and were aware of the complicated issues <br /> and multiple issues at a time that were brought forward. While difficult, Coun- <br /> cilmember Etten opined that it was possible to do, even if and when some things <br /> may be delayed, progress could still be made on multiple items on an annual work <br /> plan. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested that, at this point, this discussion stood and suggested it be <br /> referred back to the HRIEC for their further discussion as their work plan is final- <br /> ized and how it can be accomplished, whether by using subcommittees or groups <br /> of the HRIEC. However, Mayor Roe noted that the City Council was clear on <br /> where they stood on this issue, and suggested more thought by the HRIEC as to <br /> how to work through that, seeking additional discussion after their deliberation. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte recognized that the HRIEC's work plan may not be as <br /> ambitious as first drafted, but opined once they got used to doing things as a larg- <br /> er group, agreed with Commissioner Djevi's comments to identify three things to <br /> focus on and do a robust, excellent and thorough job on those things versus only <br /> doing an adequate job on ten objectives. Councilmember Laliberte recognized <br /> that some of those items were a work in progress, while some would review more <br /> in-depth work. Opining that the City Council may not have provided clear direc- <br /> tion to the HRIEC on their annual work plan, Councilmember Laliberte invited <br />