CC_Minutes_2017_1023 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday, October 23,2017 Page 22 Without objection, council members agreed with the Planning Commission to re- tain LDR designation. SITE 11: 2560 Fr.. Street Without objection, council members disagreed with the Planning Commission change to High Density Residential; instead directing its designation for medium density residential. SITE 12: 2025 County Road B Without objection, council members agreed with the Planning Commission reten- tion as MDR. SITE 13: 2212 Dale Street Without objection, council members agreed with the Planning Commission change to Neighborhood Mixed Use. Housing Goals (Exhibit D) Ms. Purdu provided an overview of the city-wide housing goals as detailed and an overall vision statement. Discussion included general consensus on how the city housing met community needs; density designations addressing potential locations for mobile home parks in the community and statutory requirements specific to them and where permit- ted (currently Conditional Uses in HDR) and how the zoning code function ad- dresses it. Without objection, Ms. Purdu was directed, with the trend to smaller households, to justify that goal to also correlate with the more global trend, not just specific to Roseville. C. Discuss Possible Amendments to Real Estate Signs as Identified in City Code, Chapter 1010 (Sign Regulations) Community Development Director Collins summarized the requested additional direction for staff, following the previous discussion in September, for review and revision of Chapter 1010 — Sign Regulations, as detailed in the staff report. At that time, staff was directed to seek additional information from area realtors; re- sulting in the responses received and included in the report; as well as an addi- tional response from the Saint Paul Area Association of Realtors in their letter to the city dated October 16, 2017. Ms. Collins noted additional feedback received through NextDoor.com; provided as a bench handout, attached hereto and made apart hereof. Having initially brought this amendment forward, Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of proposed revisions regarding open house signs for their location up to 1 mile rather than %2 mile from a subject parcel; and not addressing directional signage at this time.