Laserfiche WebLink
135 Chair Cihacek reported on recent presentations to the PWETC by Metro Transit <br />136 and MnDOT and their review of problematic areas, and asked that staff share that <br />137 information with the City Council as well. Of particular note, Chair Cihacek <br />138 advised that the PWETC had highlighted the east/west deprivations, and response <br />139 that they were addressed in future plans as money became available, but probably <br />140 not in the immediate future. <br />141 <br />142 Mayor Roe echoed many of the comments of his colleagues. Specific to transit ties <br />143 in the overall transportation plan, while the east/west routes made sense, Mayor <br />144 Roe also noted the need to remain cognizant of th e passing through Roseville on <br />145 the north -south routes to work in Downtown St. l�ul and/or Minneapolis, and the <br />146 need to enhance those routes as well. <br />147 <br />148 Specific to the PWETC's upcoming work on the Transportation and Pathway <br />149 Master Plans, Mayor Roe spoke in support of them doing so. However, Mayor Roe <br />150 asked that the PWETC pay careful attention to using co stent and clear criteria, <br />151 expressing his support for that used in the 2008 Pathwayaster Plan or asked for <br />152 similar criteria to be used that pPRUed a well -thought-out process in reviewing <br />153 and prioritizing segments as and when funding became available.yor Roe asked <br />154 that the PWETC use such a consistent method, and provide their r tionale in using <br />155 those criteria, as they ryiew athway plan. Mayor Roe opined that of particular <br />156 interest to him, and wh c idered a missing component in the previous plan, <br />157 was addressing missing d1wections from multi -family housing to public transit, <br />158 even though it ha een so ewhat addresse rth recent connections at Dale Street <br />159 and County Roa However, Mayor Roe fined that there were other relatively <br />160 small se ments be n multi-)pmily housing and transit within '/z block but only <br />161 currentSccessibl edestri using the street. <br />162 <br />163 ember Willmus r Roe's comments regarding establishing <br />164 criteria or the pathwa maste process that provided consistent scoring and <br />165 review of each segmen� Councilmember Willmus agreed that was a flaw with the <br />166 ost recent review by er PWETC members as individual commissioners <br />167 lied criteria in an ark ry manner to prioritize segments. Councilmember <br />168 Wi Imus <br />opined that it was important for the PWETC as a group to have <br />169 comm 'ty-based standards for that criteria ranking. <br />170 <br />171 Councilm McGehee agreed with the comments of her colleagues related to <br />172 transportatio lan updates. <br />173 <br />174 Councilmember McGehee stated that a remaining issue for her was private sewer <br />175 lining in addition to backflow device installations. To clarify previous comments <br />176 related to lead pipes in Roseville homes, Councilmember McGehee advised that <br />177 there were lead pipes — since replaced — in her home; and advised that in 1975 the <br />178 practice was instituted from use of lead solder to lead-free solder to sweat joints. <br />179 <br />