My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2017
>
CC_Minutes_2017_1127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2017 9:13:26 AM
Creation date
12/20/2017 9:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/27/2017
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 27, 2017 <br /> Page 8 <br /> for this development, and would be provided for City Council review and consid- <br /> eration at a later date. <br /> The applicant was present in the audience, but had no comment beyond the staff <br /> report. <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment, with no one appearing for <br /> or against. <br /> McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11471 (Attach- <br /> ment B) entitled, "A Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Rose Place Town- <br /> homes." <br /> Councilmember Etten expressed appreciation for staff s inclusion of the easement <br /> to ensure access to the property was addressed as needed for future stormwater <br /> mitigation. <br /> Councilmember McGehee thanked the developer for this project. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed appreciation for the creativity of the devel- <br /> oper with this project. <br /> Mayor Roe encouraged development of other projects of this type in other areas <br /> of Roseville where applicable. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> b. Consider Adoption of an Ordinance Amending Roseville City Code, Chap- <br /> ters 1001.10 (Definitions), 1009 (Procedures) and Table 1006-1 to allow for <br /> Contractor Yard—Limited in the Office/Business Park Zoning District <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke summarized this item as detailed as brought for- <br /> ward by staff on behalf of a property owner request at 1900 County Road C and <br /> others who lease sell properties due to limited allowances in the areas outlined in <br /> lines 14 — 16 of the RCA. Mr. Paschke noted that these challenges had come up <br /> since adoption of the current comprehensive plan and zoning ordinance, especial- <br /> ly for interior uses of multi-tenant properties and current inconsistencies in city <br /> code as discussed most recently by the Planning Commission. Mr. Paschke dis- <br /> played a map showing the areas of focus on, some guided by Planned Unit Devel- <br /> opments (PUDs) and others self-regulating. <br /> Mayor Roe summarized the proposal presented by staff to primarily take existing <br /> definitions and uses for warehousing/distribution and dividing it into two separate <br /> categories under that broader designation for warehousing as storage as one divi- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.