My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0108
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0108
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2018 1:07:20 PM
Creation date
2/28/2018 1:06:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/8/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 8, 2018 <br /> Page 12 <br /> The Council discussed reducing the time limit in Rule 3b from 5 to 3 minutes. <br /> Willmus moved, Etten seconded, to amend CITY COUNTIL PROCEDURE <br /> RULES Rule 3a, [Comments will be limited to -5 3 minutes per speaker or a dif- <br /> ferent amount of time at the discretion of the chair.] and Rule 3b. [These public <br /> comments are also limited to 3 3 minutes per speaker, or a different amount of <br /> time at the discretion of the chair.] <br /> The Council held further discussion about reducing the time limits. <br /> Mayor Roe expressed concern that a lot more people will bump up against the 3- <br /> minute time limit than those who bump up against the 5-minute limit. He was <br /> comfortable with the 5-minute timeframe. He opined that there are a few people <br /> who exceed the limits, but most people do not come close to 5 minutes. Three <br /> minutes might make it more difficult to manage the time. Philosophically, he <br /> does not want to restrict public comment. <br /> Councilmember McGehee noted it the discretion of the Chair. It can be used as <br /> more of a guideline to help people think about what they are going to say. <br /> Councilmember Etten noted that the phrase "or at the discretion of the chair" can <br /> be added to 3a and 3b. <br /> Mayor Roe suggested an amendment indicating: "or a different amount of time at <br /> the discretion of the chair" at the conclusion of both 3a and 3b. The Council con- <br /> curred with this friendly amendment. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte questioned why the language does not say "up to 5 <br /> minutes," as a"different amount of time" seems arbitrary. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Laliberte, McGehee,Willmus, and Etten. <br /> Nays: Roe. <br /> Motion carried as amended. <br /> Councilmember Willmus initiated discussion on section 4. He suggested the <br /> Council, for a trial period, set the items on the agenda based upon a 9:30pm ad- <br /> journment. He noted often times, the Council has meetings that run well beyond <br /> 10:OOpm, and that is not beneficial to the residents bringing business before the <br /> Council or to the service being provided to the community. He acknowledged <br /> that this issue of timing is related to how the agendas are laid out, i.e., the time <br /> slots that are put out for various agenda items. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.