My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0326
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2018 2:35:30 PM
Creation date
4/18/2018 2:35:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/26/2018
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 26, 2018 <br /> Page 22 <br /> Commissioner Harold noted that there is a level of uncertainty as to <br /> whether that property will stay a strip mall. If the City takes out bonds, it <br /> is presumed the bonds will not be paid off in the next four or five years. <br /> He asked about the Council's plan if the income stream is no longer there. <br /> Mayor Roe stated if the City decides to go a different direction, it can sell <br /> the property and pay off the bonds. Secondly, if the property is developed <br /> down the road for a Public Works building or a community center many <br /> years down the road, those project costs can include payoff of these bonds. <br /> His opinion is to operate it as a strip mall with tenants for the duration of <br /> the bonds. <br /> Commissioner McMurray asked about the impact of technology on the Li- <br /> cense Center and the ongoing need for the physical building. <br /> Mayor Roe noted there are changes in the retail market that have be taken <br /> into account, and the balance of tenants may change. The City can evalu- <br /> ate whether it is still beneficial to own the property. This is an opportunity <br /> of not wanting to put money into a leased space that the City will only <br /> control for four years. <br /> Chair Schroeder questioned the value the FC is providing to the Council, <br /> since they make a lot of recommendations to the Council and do not hear <br /> back. She wondered whether the process of making recommendations <br /> needs some fine-tuning, as the FC wants to provide valuable information. <br /> The FC was put together a few years ago, so she questioned whether the <br /> FC is doing what the Council wants it to do. If the Council wants to keep <br /> the FC, the two-way feedback should be improved. <br /> Councilmember Willmus stated there is value in the FC. There is some- <br /> times a disconnect in communication between the Council and FC. He <br /> suggested having Chair Schroeder bring forward recommendations to the <br /> Council directly. <br /> The Council concurred there is tremendous value in the FC. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that because the Council does not adopt <br /> something does not mean there is not any value there. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte noted that there are other Commissions who <br /> have expressed the same concern about not providing adequate Council <br /> feedback. <br /> Recess <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.