My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 8:59:48 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 8:59:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 17, 2018 <br /> Page 9 <br /> uments and everyone can see the plan and amount and when the project will start. <br /> Also, for transparency reasons, the $5,000 threshold is important to her and the <br /> public, so the residents do know what is going on and not just blankly being ap- <br /> proved somewhere. <br /> Mayor Roe stated approval of over$5,000 purchasesis usually a consent item and <br /> if discussion needs to be done on it, the Council will remove it from consent for <br /> further review. He thought the $5,000 limit has made sense over the years. He <br /> recommended the Commission take some of the feedback received and work <br /> more on policy language. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated in regard to Attachment A, top of page two, an item <br /> that now seem to be covered by the City public financing process that has been <br /> established through community development is the first bullet point. He won- <br /> dered if that point belonged in a CIP discussion because the City has a fleshed-out <br /> policy that has been set forward in the last year that does this, but it does not seem <br /> it fits under a CIP,but rather in the City community development process. <br /> Chair Schroeder thought it might make sense for the Commission to review the <br /> entire policy and then bring the proposed plan forward after changes. <br /> Mayor Roe thought it might make sense, in looking at the practicalities of this, to <br /> go back to a portion of the City's existing CIP documentation and figure out if a <br /> column should be added for the asset category to the document or is there other <br /> documentation that needed to be changed or added. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thought it would be good to figure out when an event <br /> would trigger the start of that process because the Council would not want to all <br /> of the sudden come too late to make it work. She asked what action, what dis- <br /> cussion, would prompt or trigger the start of the event? <br /> Mayor Roe thought one trigger would be if the residents came to the City wanting <br /> something that the City has never had before and then there is the catastrophic <br /> event or immediate attention. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated the Council is looking for a little more fleshing out <br /> and what would the template actually look like, what would the community be <br /> seeing, and what would the Council be reviewing at stages. He would love to see <br /> what this item turns into. <br /> Chair Schroeder thought the big part was the Commissioners wanted to make sure <br /> the Commission was going down the right path with this item and then moving <br /> forward with further review, changes and additions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.