My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 9:03:22 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 9:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/24/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 24, 2018 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte wondered if Chief Mathwig could foresee that Rose- <br /> ville would have enough mental health cases for a full-time position or could this <br /> potentially be shared services with another city. <br /> Chief Mathwig thought the best course of action is a Mental Health Liaison Of- <br /> ficer that is a Roseville police officer. He did think there were enough families <br /> and people in crisis that needed help to justify the position. Plan B is talking with <br /> other Chiefs and the Sheriff about joining together and possibility of having that <br /> service paid by non-profit and shared services. There have been two meetings on <br /> that so far. He thought that was a good course of action but did not think it was <br /> the best. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated not only did she think the shared service was a <br /> good idea but if talking about follow up and working with families that have these <br /> sorts of issues in their home, that is a service that the City EMT's are possibly al- <br /> ready able to think about and work with. She thought there were several options <br /> on the table. <br /> Councilmember McGehee wanted to verify that the City Manager's budget is just <br /> for the cost and the levy side just for the City was a 1.9% increase. The property <br /> tax portion of the budget is a 1.9% increase. She wanted to give a nod to staff that <br /> staff is holding themselves below the cost of living figure. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon pointed out that the 1.9% increase is for the property tax supported <br /> budget which totals approximately thirty million dollars but twenty million dollars <br /> of that is levy. <br /> Councilmember McGehee indicated that was what she was pointing out and <br /> wanted to give staff credit for the low budget numbers. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that was a challenge in people's perspective to see a 1.9% in- <br /> crease in the spending side, but a bigger increase proposed in the tax levy. The <br /> challenge is that the portion of that spending covered by the tax levy can vary de- <br /> pending on what other sources are doing. If the other sources are not providing <br /> support, the levy has to make up the difference, not to mention what is being dis- <br /> cussed about adding additional levy support for the notion of paying for operating <br /> expenses out of the actual revenues rather than using reserves, which the City has <br /> had the luxury of doing in the past but cannot continue to do if the reserves are <br /> not being replenished at the same time. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was anyone from the public that wished to speak on this <br /> item. <br /> Public Comment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.