My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2018
>
CC_Minutes_2018_0924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2018 9:03:22 AM
Creation date
10/12/2018 9:03:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/24/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, September 24, 2018 <br /> Page 2 <br /> the businesses along the corridor and the City has communicated to the businesses <br /> that there will likely be assessments with the project and the City would do the as- <br /> sessment. <br /> Mayor Roe asked what part of the costs would be assessed. <br /> Mr. Culver stated the costs will be coming forward to the Council in October. <br /> The feasibility study was ordered in August and the City would pro-rate an as- <br /> sessment, the cost of the project as if it were a thirty-six-foot-wide commercial <br /> roadway such as Walnut. The businesses would then be assessed based on that <br /> project cost. The City would still do the benefit analysis to make sure it meets the <br /> Chapter 429 assessment requirements and assessing them only for the benefit to <br /> the property. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if this would be for the roadway costs, would there be other <br /> costs included, and would it include pathways as well. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated it would be only roadway costs. He noted pathways are not <br /> assessed per the City assessment policy. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was any water or sewer work that would not be as- <br /> sessed. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated that was correct. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon asked for clarification if the City would only assess for the City <br /> portion of the costs or for the overall County project costs. <br /> Mr. Culver stated with any County project there is a City cost participation to that, <br /> so the City assessment would not exceed that. The assessment would only be the <br /> City portion of the costs. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked what percent of the project is the City portion. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated it was not a simple calculation. He stated the calculation is <br /> based on the County's cost participation policy. He noted it would be covered in <br /> detail in the feasibility study when presented. <br /> Councilmember McGehee asked if the power lines that run along the roadway <br /> could be undergrounded. <br /> Mr. Culver stated there are some large towers that carry the transmission wires, <br /> but those wires will not be touched. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.