Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 3,2018 <br /> Page 10 <br /> McGehee moved, Willmus seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11559 (At- <br /> tachment C) entitled, "Resolution Adopting the Final 2019 Annual Budget for the <br /> City of Roseville." <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Laliberte thanked the residents who have emailed, called, and <br /> sent feedback cards. She thought any feedback the City gets from residents is ap- <br /> preciated and helpful. <br /> Mayor Roe stated by State Statute, the City is required to adopt a budget by funds. <br /> He noted Attachment F in the packet is a number of schedules which is outlined <br /> by fund the projected revenues by source and the projected expenditures by type. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: McGehee, Willmus, Laliberte, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> d. Adopt a Final 2019 EDA Tax Levy <br /> Finance Director Chris Miller briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the RCA <br /> and related attachments dated December 3, 2018. <br /> Councilmember Willmus asked if the City levied any dollars for the 2018 EDA <br /> budget and levy to fund any type of reserve balances. He stated his recollection <br /> was the City had not. In discussing with Mr. Miller at the start of the meeting that <br /> is the case. He thought the City had strictly funded the programs last year and did <br /> not set anything aside for reserves. Leading into a question for future years he <br /> thought this is perhaps a situation as the City goes down the road, reserve ac- <br /> counts may want to tie to various salaries, things like that, as the EDA does not <br /> necessarily have Capital needs. That is something the Council should be aware of <br /> and might be an area where those reserve ratios maybe differ than in correlation to <br /> the budget. <br /> Mayor Roe stated to be clear for the EDA and HRA, the City has a number of <br /> funds that are set aside in specific accounts that are dedicated to certain programs <br /> and purposes, especially, some of which are statutorily limited to what can be <br /> done with those and those are not reflected in the balances. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated in looking at the original budget package, At- <br /> tachment E, in the fees reported, looking at community development, the first <br /> funding status is 4,998% and keeps going and in twenty years it is 475%. She <br /> wondered if there is any way the City can use some of this surplus to cover some <br /> of the good things the City wants to do with the EDA. <br />