My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2019
>
2019_01-22_PWETCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 2:04:30 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/22/2019
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Roseville Maintenance Facility Report <br />102617.6 <br />Off -Site Storage <br />Currently the City of Roseville rents an off-site facility for overflow and seasonal equipment. To utilize <br />this equipment, the Maintenance staff must drive to the remote location and pick up the vehicles. This <br />decreases worker productivity and slows response time. Seasonal equipment must be rotated between <br />on-site and off-site parking twice a year. <br />Yard <br />Uncovered outdoor materials, like sand and class 5, are exposed to the elements. Some material erodes <br />away but the greater challenge is water and ice filling the piles. In winter, employees must break apart <br />frozen sand and gravel by hand before loading into vehicles for use. In the summer, the extra moisture <br />adds to the weight and creates a greater burden for employees. <br />The diagram below depicts the ideal yard sizes for the existing building and Schemes A, B, C, & D. To <br />expand the building on the existing site would require increasing the yard size. The vehicle storage must <br />increase to accommodate larger modern equipment. This same factor affects the yard size. Larger <br />vehicles require a wider turning radius. It also becomes more dangerous to back-up in large vehicles due <br />to the bigger blind spots. <br />TOTAL BUILDING IDEALYARDAREA <br />IDEAL BUILDING TO YARD RATIO 1:2 <br />FOOTPRINT <br />EXISTING 59,420 SF 118,840 SF (2.72 ACRES) <br />SCHEME A 59,420 SF 118,840 SF (2.72 ACRES) <br />SCHEME B 68,110 SF 136,220 SF (3.12 ACRES) <br />SCHEME C 75,620 SF 151,240 SF (3.47 ACRES) <br />SCHEME D 83,620 SF 167,240 SF (3.84 ACRES) <br />w w w <br />U U Up <br />h h <br />I�I� ml <br />mo of <br />I�If �I <br />EXISTING <br />CHEMEC <br />EXISTING <br />TO <br />IDEAL YARD <br />U U V <br />16,2008E BUILDING <br />BUILDING <br />AREA FOR <br />59,420 SF <br />YARD RATIO 1:1 <br />EXISTING <br />I OI O OI <br />59,000 SF <br />BUILDING <br />(1.35ACRES) <br />118,840 SF <br />wI w �I <br />(2 72 ACRES) <br />QI < QI <br />Illi it <br />I o 0 oI <br />L—J <br />TSCHEMESCHEMED <br />24,200 SF <br />Diagram of Ideal Yard sizes for Scheme A, 8, C, & D <br />KODET ARCH ITECTURAL GROUP, LTD. 15 Groveland Terrace, Minneapolis, MN 55403+1154 T: (612) 377-2737 <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.