My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0415
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0415
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2019 2:55:42 PM
Creation date
5/7/2019 2:55:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/15/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,April 15, 2019 <br /> Page 11 <br /> same with rental registration, and are looking at proposing a reduction in the cur- <br /> rent rental registration fee and similar to this, would like it to be very small and to <br /> simply cover the cost of the software system that is being used. <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment, with no one coming for- <br /> ward. <br /> Mr. Englund asked, in regard to the existing Rental Registration Ordinance, <br /> whether Council has any input as to adding an inspection component to the exist- <br /> ing ordinance or if Council would prefer to leave the ordinance as is. <br /> The Council preferred to leave the ordinance as is. <br /> d. Discussion Regarding the Environmental Review Worksheet Process Estab- <br /> lished via Resolution 11198 in 2014 <br /> Community Development Director Janice Gundlach briefly highlighted this item <br /> as detailed in the RCA and related attachments dated April 15, 2019. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte complimented Ms. Gundlach's presentation and packet <br /> of information. <br /> Mayor Roe stated he was surprised these were being submitted to State Agencies <br /> for review because it was his understanding at the time, in his mind, that the City <br /> was trying to achieve an accounting of environmental issues on these sites that the <br /> City was able to have in one place, an inventory of whatever the issues might be <br /> on a particular site. He did not think it was going out to other agencies for their <br /> review and comment. He wanted to speak to the original process, being a part of <br /> it, the idea of having something like this still available and updated is something <br /> he might want to see continue as the City goes through the remaining redevelop- <br /> ment in the Twin Lakes area. But, in his mind, an adequate way to try to address <br /> it is a summary narrative of what the environmental issues known on the site are <br /> and making sure it covers all of the issues that are covered in an ERW and not <br /> something that is sent out to other entities for approval. He stated he would not <br /> want to lose something like that but would be open to entertaining the idea of <br /> pulling back from the intensity of what this worksheet is. <br /> Mr. Trudgeon stated many of the uses in Twin Lakes are permitted now. If there <br /> is any assistance from the City requested, then that would be an opportunity for a <br /> check-in with the Council and perhaps an opportunity to share some of that narra- <br /> tive. Otherwise, it might be that the City is the passthrough for any environmental <br /> cleanup grant. The City Council would not be looking at the development site <br /> plan itself; the City would be looking at cleaning up the property. He asked if the <br /> Council still wanted to see any development that happens or to know the full envi- <br /> ronmental issues that are happening behind the scenes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.