My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2019 9:51:30 AM
Creation date
5/22/2019 9:51:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/6/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, May 6, 2019 <br /> Page 22 <br /> community because of the connection with a lot of City people, including the City <br /> Manager and people on the Council. <br /> Mayor Roe stated there were definitely topics that came up, which never got to <br /> have an event that were not necessarily Law Enforcement related. There was <br /> some momentum to look at some additional topics, one of the things that some of <br /> the community participants were especially concerned about was that the City did <br /> a few things as a result of the Castille shooting and then once done, it was <br /> checked off the list. He stated participation in the GARE process and acknowl- <br /> edging the equity lens of a lot of what the City does can translate to looking at this <br /> process. His personal thought is that he might be willing to leave it as it is and <br /> perhaps let the previous planning group come back together and talk about what <br /> that group wants to do. <br /> Councilmember Groff thought those are all good points, but his concern is this <br /> just sort of ended. The last meeting he was at, he understood it would be ongoing. <br /> He stated for the community, it is good to either have some sort of closure or have <br /> something going forward indicating a schedule of some sort because right now, it <br /> is in a limbo state. He would like to make sure there is input from a pretty general <br /> population rather than it look like a group from the City deciding something. <br /> Councilmember Etten stated he would support the Mayor's idea of bringing back <br /> that original planning group and he would be open as to whether that group would <br /> come back to the Council to bring their proposal forward. He liked the idea of <br /> having people who are not necessarily tied to the City interacting with a diverse <br /> group from the City to bring out and flush out new ideas that might not be other- <br /> wise looked at. <br /> Councilmember Willmus did not know if it needed to come back to the City or <br /> the Council for approval. If it is under the guise of a Commission, then it needs to <br /> happen but keeping it more free flowing, more of its own, he did not know if that <br /> aspect needs to be approved. <br /> Mayor Roe stated while it might not be something that comes back to the Council <br /> for approval, he thought it might be beneficial to use the City Council meeting to <br /> update the community on where it is at for people watching the meeting and <br /> might be an appropriate check in without Council approval or blessing. <br /> Councilmember Groff concurred with this being an update and not an approval. <br /> The City Council was in favor of reconvening the original group and having <br /> periodic check-in and updates without Council approval. <br /> Recess <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.