My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0603
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 3:54:23 PM
Creation date
6/18/2019 3:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/17/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, June 3, 2019 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Wilimus, Laliberte, Groff, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte stated there have been several conversations about get- <br /> ting this medium housing density into the Community so for that reason she was <br /> supportive and appreciates the buffer/transition that is provided. <br /> 7. Business Items <br /> b. Consider a Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Change, Official Zoning <br /> Map (Rezoning) Change, and a Conditional Use for Increased Site Density <br /> for a 60-Unit Affordable Senior Housing Project at 165 Owasso Boulevard, <br /> and 3011,3029, and 3033 Rice Street(PF19-004) <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the RCA <br /> and related attachments dated June 3, 2019. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified a lot of times when projects come forward it is sort of a <br /> staged process where the City does the analysis and potential approval of the <br /> Comprehensive Land Use Map change for the guidance of the property and then <br /> once the Metropolitan Council approves that, that is when the rezoning comes <br /> back before the Council for consideration, despite the fact that it might have been <br /> heard at the public hearing at the Planning Commission. This process is a little <br /> different than that. He asked either staff or the City Attorney elaborate more on <br /> how things tie together in the approvals this evening and why the City is doing all <br /> of these three items as a single consideration. <br /> Mr. Paschke thought the main reason is one has to do with the applicant going <br /> through and trying to proceed forward with some funding which is necessary for <br /> this project. The other is to tie this project together and seek the Council approval <br /> as one combined project. There is the Comp. Plan Amendment, Rezoning and the <br /> Conditional Use that then become complete. If it comes to the point where, based <br /> on these conditions, the City does not receive the appropriate information or the <br /> items necessary to support one of those, staff would not record Resolutions or <br /> adopt Ordinances in that point in time, and the project would not move forward. <br /> Mayor Roe stated the Zoning Change Ordinance would have been adopted as a <br /> City Council but what is the result. <br /> Mr. Paschke stated staff would not publish the Ordinance or record the Resolu- <br /> tions without the applicant receiving building permit and other approvals first. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that it would seem that if the property is reguided and the <br /> Metropolitan Council approves the reguiding of the property, that action is done <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.