CC_Minutes_2019_0708 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 8, 2019 Page 15 ly different and clear choice. He thought it was a problem to have this person stay, not only as Chair but at any level of Commissioner or continue to be part of that. He indicated to the First Amendment piece, he would take the advice of the City Attorney but also the person could have sat down and come up to make pub- lic comment like other people. One of the concerns he put in his email was mak- ing sure he could bring up things he felt were important, which he could have done as a resident. He noted there were multiple avenues for Mr. Bull to express his concerns or thoughts on that issue. He thought it was a tough position to ask Commissioners to regulate their fellow members in a situation like this and it should fall to the Council because the Council creates the Commission, appoints the Commissioners, and potentially, in this case, remove a Commissioner. He thinks that falls in the Council's purview to step into that and make a decision. Mayor Roe explained as a specific response to the motion, he does understand the difficult role of a Chair, especially in a new Chairmanship. He thought the City could point to at least a couple of not too distant examples of new Chairs having some difficulty with particularly challenging hearings and he was certainly trying to give as much benefit of the doubt in that regard as possible because that was only fair. He noted it was important to state that regardless of what the Council might do, it was appropriate to take some sort of action in response to the Chair's actions related to this. The biggest issue to him is the lack of perception of impar- tiality that came as a result of not recusing himself from the participation and was very important, especially when the Planning Commission is the officially desig- nated City hearing body for these land use cases. Mayor Roe thought it was difficult to determine exactly what was an appropriate punishment to fit the crime, so to speak, and that is why he listed all of the possi- bilities and wanted to make sure the Council had as much opportunity to look at all and think about all of the possibilities. He was not completely sure the motion was the most appropriate punishment for the action but he also believed that any action taken as a City Council in this regard should be as close to unanimous, if not unanimous as possible because he would be much more concerned if there was a split vote. For that reason, he was leaning towards supporting that motion in the absence of an alternative. Councilmember Laliberte indicated she shared Mayor Roe's impression that some action is warranted. She did not know if this would have been the one but there is a motion on the floor and she thought it was important for the Council to be unit- ed. Councilmember Groff appreciated the comment about a new Chair because he did think of that as well and did not want to ignore that this was one or Mr. Bull's first meetings as Chair. The thing that bothers him is that even after all of this discussion and feedback from his fellow Commissioners and some of the Council along with the City Attorney, Mr. Bull still does not see this behavior or the pro-