My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0708
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0708
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2019 3:49:59 PM
Creation date
7/23/2019 3:49:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/8/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 8, 2019 <br /> Page 16 <br /> cess that he went through as a problem. He noted anyone can make mistakes, but <br /> he wanted to think that anyone could learn from those mistakes. He did not see <br /> that happening with this situation and that is why he would be supporting this mo- <br /> tion. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated to the question of what the appropriate level of <br /> response is, he would go back to his comments that he did not think it would mat- <br /> ter that he was acting as Chair so much as he was a Commissioner and the legal <br /> advise was recusal and what made sense for the impartiality for the process. He <br /> stated allowing Mr. Bull to stay on as Commissioner but not the Chair and poten- <br /> tially ignoring advice again of this serious manner is a concern for him. He did <br /> not think removal as Chair, whether it is allowed or not, as much as, he did not <br /> think it solved the concern of judgement in this situation. He did not think it mat- <br /> tered, to him, whether Mr. Bull was acting Chair or as a Commissioner, even <br /> though there were concerns around that. He thought what the Council needs to <br /> consider in this very serious potential action, is how the person would act in any <br /> role on the Commission. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed that the lack of deference to the City Attorney's <br /> recommendation is troubling and hoped that everyone in the City would listen to <br /> the City Attorney's advice in a situation like that. She thought also the lack of <br /> acknowledgement or ownership of what took place was a concern. <br /> Mayor Roe did not see this as having anything to do with the particular position- <br /> that the Chair took on the particular issue that was before the Commission and has <br /> nothing to do with that. Rather, it was the fact of taking a position and then not <br /> following the advice for recusal and all of the associated issues that are related. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None <br /> Councilmember Groff asked how this action affects Mr. Bull's position on the <br /> Ethics Commission. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated because Mr. Bull is no longer a Commissioner, he will no <br /> longer be a representative on the Ethics Commission. <br /> f. Declare Vacancy on the Planning Commission <br /> City Manager Trudgeon briefly highlighted this item as detailed in the RCA and <br /> related attachments dated July 8, 2019. He noted there are now two open posi- <br /> tions on the Planning Commission due to the previous action. <br /> Willmus moved, Etten seconded, declaring two vacancies on the Planning Com- <br /> mission for a term that expires March 31, 2020 and for a term that expires on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.