My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_0826
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_0826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2019 3:19:33 PM
Creation date
9/10/2019 3:19:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/26/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
Publication Newspaper
Focus
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, August 26, 2019 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Groff moved, Etten seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11627 entitled, "Reso- <br /> lution Approving the Preliminary Plat of Rosedale Center Seventh Addition." <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Groff thought it made sense to him. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> Laliberte moved, Etten seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11628 entitled, <br /> "Resolution Approving the Final Plat of Rosedale Center Seventh Addition." <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Laliberte, Groff, Etten, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> c. Adopt a Resolution Approving the Fairview Avenue Addition Preliminary <br /> Plat to Subdivide the Subject Property into Two Lots for Development of a <br /> Medical Office Building and an Apartment Facility, Adopt a Resolution Ap- <br /> proving the Fairview Avenue Addition Final Plat, and Adopt a Resolution <br /> Approving the Proposed Multifamily Residential Development as a Condi- <br /> tional Use (PF19-016) <br /> City Planner Bryan Lloyd summarized the request as detailed in the Request for <br /> Council Action and related attachments dated August 26, 2019. <br /> Mayor Roe noted the requirements in the Mixed-Use District do not specify a <br /> height limitation for multi-family or those types of requirements that are seen in <br /> the High-Density Residential District and he knew that was talked about a little <br /> bit in the Planning Commission discussion. He thought there was mention of an <br /> overall height limit in that district. He thought it was sixty-five feet and this is not <br /> approaching that height. <br /> Mr. Lloyd explained that was correct. This building height is in the fifties and in <br /> the Community Mixed-Use 3 District, there is a height limit north of sixty feet. <br /> Mayor Roe indicated as far as single family residential nearby, he did not believe <br /> there was anything within hundreds of feet of this location other than perhaps on <br /> the south side of County Road C. <br /> Mr. Lloyd explained the James Addition neighborhood would be just south, past <br /> County Road C and rail line that is there. Otherwise there would be some neigh- <br /> borhoods further north. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.