My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_1021
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_1021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/5/2019 2:51:40 PM
Creation date
11/5/2019 2:51:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, October 21, 2019 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Willmus moved, Groff seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11642 entitled, <br /> "Resolution Approving the Proposed Amusement Area as a Conditional Use at <br /> 1955 County Road B2." <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Willmus indicated he supported this and appreciated staff's re- <br /> sponse on how the city would like to handle these types of businesses in the fu- <br /> ture. <br /> Councilmember Groff supported this business, thought it was very interesting, <br /> and would be a great addition to the community. <br /> Councilmember Etten appreciated the great work of the company already in Ro- <br /> seville and thought it was a great way to add some cool and fun to the city. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed and was specifically supportive of this in this <br /> particular location. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus, Groff, Etten, Laliberte and Roe. <br /> Nays: None <br /> Mayor Roe asked the Council for thoughts on what the next steps for this type of <br /> business should be in the city. <br /> Councilmember Willmus explained the Council will be having a joint meeting <br /> with the Planning Commission soon and he would be interested in discussing this <br /> with them at that time. He thought when the city has these situations that arise <br /> where it is new, the city should take an extra step and look if there is another way <br /> to handle it within the Code to accommodate that type of thing. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte agreed and was also supportive of staff bringing it for- <br /> ward for the Council to look at further and have the conversation with the Plan- <br /> ning Commission. She did appreciate the ability to consider a project and where <br /> it is located, especially if it is in the vicinity of residential area. <br /> Councilmember Groff supported having staff review it and the Planning Commis- <br /> sion have their discussion as well. He would like to see the Code changed to re- <br /> flect new types of businesses. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed and would like to have the Code reviewed and up- <br /> dated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.