My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_1202
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_1202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 3:36:10 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 3:36:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/2/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,December 2, 2019 <br /> Page 30 <br /> Councilmember Etten encouraged staff to look at that. He thought the city re- <br /> ceived an email from someone on County Road B complaining. He would en- <br /> courage staff to look at densities of people and not just County roads. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte appreciated the suggestions of what staff will do differ- <br /> ently. She asked for clarification on Mr. Culver's discussion relating the notifica- <br /> tion and what was meant by saying"we may." <br /> Mr. Culver gave some examples of different projects and how the city notified the <br /> residents. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte explained as she looked at what the city has for current <br /> language, there is the ability for the city to bill the company for enforcement and <br /> corrective work. With all the rain last year, it was a wet season, she asked wheth- <br /> er public works was camped out there, was any work done, and did the city lose <br /> money just trying to stay on top of inspections. <br /> Mr. Culver explained staff does annually review how much time is spent out there <br /> versus what the city took in for fees for erosion control, grading, etc. The city <br /> probably spent a lot more time on erosion control permits this year than is done <br /> on average. If the city has to take corrective action, the city will pull against the <br /> project escrow. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if any work is done on the Roselawn project outside of the <br /> standard spring, summer, fall construction timeframe. <br /> Mr. Culver presumed some excavation was being done in the winter. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was any thought given to, not just a notification given in <br /> a letter that this is going to happen, but taking it a step further like is done with <br /> noise variances where it has to come to the Council for approval with a hearing. <br /> He could see in the case of something like this where it might be beneficial. <br /> Mr. Culver indicated staff has not considered that, but it could be a possibility. <br /> He thought that would be up to the Council but puts some political pressure on the <br /> Council as far as approving or denying projects based on hauling of material. <br /> Staff feels it is a slippery slope to go down to potentially kill a project because a <br /> lot of material needs to be hauled. <br /> Mayor Roe thought the city could think about creating a hauling permit as well. <br /> Councilmember Etten indicated he would be reluctant to get into that game as it <br /> would open up a can of worms for various development projects. He thought the <br /> pieces that are outlined here give some checks on that process. He noted the city <br /> was dealing with a very unusual and significant project that the city wished it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.