My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_1125
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_1125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 3:40:20 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 3:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 25, 2019 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Councilmember Laliberte explained because there so many buildings affected and <br /> there was a request for a plan, she would ask whether there was a desire to ad- <br /> dress one building at a time and get that back to being approved for license again <br /> or what would the plan be for attacking all of these issues. <br /> Mr. Roston explained he did submit a detailed plan that both details what has <br /> been done as well as a projection for timing. He thought it was exhibit D to his <br /> letter submitted to Council. He indicated it was hard to answer that question on a <br /> general level because different issues are in different buildings. He noted the lo- <br /> gistics needed to be worked out. Their goal is to get this corrected as fast as pos- <br /> sible. <br /> Mayor Roe reviewed public hearing protocol and opened the public hearing at ap- <br /> proximately 7:12 p.m. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Ms. Tammy McGehee, 77 Mid Oaks Lane <br /> Mr. McGehee indicated she was speaking on this topic because she was part of <br /> the Council when this went forward, and she would like to remind everyone that <br /> when the Council did this, it was because of these apartments. She explained she <br /> has lived in Roseville longer than fifteen years and these apartments have not <br /> been the star of Roseville at any point during that time. To say that there were not <br /> any problems is simply to say the city did not know about the problems it had be- <br /> cause the city was first alerted to these problems by social workers who went into <br /> those buildings to try to help those residents. The City Council felt compelled to <br /> see to it that people who lived in this community were allowed to live in safe, de- <br /> cent, clean, respectable housing. She noted the city went through the first process <br /> and the only apartment complex owners who came and complained about the re- <br /> view of their materials was this particular apartment complex. This has obviously <br /> been an ongoing problem and those cupboards and cabinets were not installed last <br /> year and look like that now. She noted the owner of the complex cannot control <br /> the BBQ in the bathtub or the bagging of the smoke detectors but there were <br /> meetings with tenants living in those apartments and there were many social ser- <br /> vice agencies within the city and community that were willing to go in. She noted <br /> a video was made and well received about renter's responsibilities and tenant's <br /> responsibilities and the city was careful to make sure that people were not dis- <br /> placed in any of these processes. But she felt it is unacceptable to have this type <br /> of housing in any community, not just the metro area but everywhere in the Unit- <br /> ed States. She thought the city had a responsibility to see to it that the buildings <br /> are cleaned up even if the city needs to take them by eminent domain to clean <br /> them up. The buildings are not going to be cleaned up by a piecemeal basis when <br /> there is mold in walls, roaches in the sockets, and the whole place is falling apart <br /> because nobody is taking care of it. She noted that most of these buildings and <br /> most of the rent is being supported by Minnesota taxpayers so somebody else can <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.