My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2019_1125
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2019
>
CC_Minutes_2019_1125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 3:40:20 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 3:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/2019
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,November 25, 2019 <br /> Page 8 <br /> live in a nice location without roaches. She urged the Council to get after these <br /> problems because she thought these buildings, after seeing the photos, are going <br /> to be really difficult to rehab and will not be a one-week deal. <br /> With no one else appearing to speak, Mayor Roe closed the public hearing at ap- <br /> proximately 7:17 p.m. <br /> Mayor Roe explained there are other tools that can be undertaken that the Council <br /> is not currently considering but remain on the table and involve more intense ac- <br /> tivity in terms of a form of receivership and the rents going toward a fund to take <br /> care of the issues, which is not being proposed but could be considered. <br /> Willmus moved, Etten seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 11653 entitled, <br /> "Revocation of Multifamily Rental License for Properties Located 175, 195, 221, <br /> Larpenteur Ave.; 1722, 1725, 1735, and 1736 Woodbridge Court; and 1720, <br /> 1735, 1740, 1745, 1750 Marion Street Owned by G&G Management. LLC. For <br /> Property Known as Marion Street/The Brittanys Apartments." <br /> Council Discussion <br /> Councilmember Willmus thought this was an overdue first step. This complex, <br /> for years, has been an ongoing issue. He thought it is rapidly approaching a point <br /> where staff needs to be more proactive in looking at some of the additional steps <br /> to force some changes there. There are certainly things that might seem to be be- <br /> yond the control of a property management but with proper property management <br /> communication and dialogue with one's tenants, many of these do not need to <br /> happen in the first place. This is a significant issue that he thought was lacking <br /> with this particular owner in relationship with the tenants that the property owners <br /> have and is something that cannot continue to go on. He indicated the city needs <br /> to be more aggressive about how the city is going to approach and deal with it. <br /> Councilmember Etten agreed and thought this was a very important first step. He <br /> agreed with the comments from various people and that this is not anywhere near <br /> a new situation. He indicated the city has heard for years from people going in <br /> there from social workers, fire inspectors, and police officers, that there were is- <br /> sues and also licensing issues from day one. He noted he attended a portion of the <br /> resident meeting on November 12th and was aghast at the stories and testimony <br /> provided, what the residents were living with and living through, and these are not <br /> acceptable conditions in any part of the world. He thought these steps needed to <br /> be taken. <br /> Councilmember Groff agreed with the comments and he thought the problem here <br /> is there is a pattern of neglect that has gone on for many years. He indicated he <br /> has been in those units in the last three or four years and was very surprised at the <br /> conditions. He was glad that the inspection department went in to check the safe- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.